You are not logged in.

#26 2010-03-20 20:27:06

skualito
Member
Registered: 2008-11-19
Posts: 203

Re: LFS

I've also been using LFS as a main distro 2-3 years ago, on an old computer, with paco package manager for some time. But as it's been said a big part of the build is no more than a ./configure, make, sudo "paco -lD make install", a bit repetitive. Though it's an interesting reading. I found it hard to maintain LFS updated and switched to archlinux, that was as responsive on this old system and more up to date. Still, I learned quite some things from building and building and rebuilding LFS (and BLFS) systems. On an old pentium3 bootsraping and building gcc took something like 2-3 hours and the whole LFS around 10 hours I think... It should be a breeze on a fast and modern cpu.

Offline

#27 2010-03-20 21:30:35

bernarcher
Forum Fellow
From: Germany
Registered: 2009-02-17
Posts: 2,281

Re: LFS

Oh, yes, the "paco" package manager. I discovered it when building my (B)LFS system the second time. It turned out to be an invaluable tool to maintain the system.


To know or not to know ...
... the questions remain forever.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB