You are not logged in.
[root@n6re ~]# pacman -S kernel26
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (35): linux-api-headers-2.6.33.1-1
tzdata-2010h-1 glibc-2.11.1-2
ncurses-5.7-2.1 readline-6.1.002-1
bash-4.1.005-1 gcc-libs-4.4.3-2
db-4.8.26-1 zlib-1.2.4-1
cracklib-2.8.13-2 pam-1.1.1-1
shadow-4.1.4.2-2 attr-2.4.44-1
acl-2.2.48-1 gmp-5.0.1-1 libcap-2.1
coreutils-8.4-2
kernel26-firmware-2.6.33.2-1
module-init-tools-3.11.1-2
mkinitcpio-busybox-1.15.3-5
util-linux-ng-2.17.1-1
gen-init-cpio-2.6.32-1 findutils-4.4
sed-4.2.1-1 pcre-8.02-1 grep-2.6.3-
filesystem-2010.02-4 libusb-0.1.12-4
glib2-2.24.0-1 udev-151-3 file-5.04
gzip-1.4-1 which-2.20-2
mkinitcpio-0.6.3-1 kernel26-2.6.33.2
Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
Total Installed Size: 235.73 MB
The items above have been downloaded but pacman reports all are in the system already (not true) and none were upgraded.
Present kernel is 32.
Cannot display pacman -Q.
Recently installed pacman-cage.
Have I missed some upgrade to pacman?
Last edited by lilsirecho (2010-04-14 05:23:52)
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
Seems unlikely that it's being caused by missed a pacman update, though you can check with pacman --version (should be 3.3.3).
I'd try 'pt-pacman-uncage && pacman -Syy' - one thing that comes to mind is the loopback fs for pacman-cage not being large enough. You can check whether this might be the case with 'df -h /var/lib/pacman'.
Offline
chpin;
Thanks for the comments.
I now have a further problem after forcing the upgrade.
The device by uuid for my HDD is verified by my backup drive with the command BLKID.
However, the drive with that uuid does not boot giving the error:
Unable to determine the major/minor number of root device...(the uuid is correctly stated).
The boot is halted with ramfs prompt.
I ran e2fsck on all partitions correcting what errors showed.
The drive consistently fails with the above error.
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
There has been a bug-report recently opened for this: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18810. Seems a possible solution has just been posted there.
Offline
Posted solution doesn't work.
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
FS#18810 is assigned to no one!
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
Ηmm, I'm pretty sure that there has been damage to /var/lib/pacman
Is anything in there ?
Offline
flamelab:
There is 696 packages in /var/lib/pacman/local........
EDIT: I apologize for the shift in the problem which is now that the system doesn't boot due to uuid not being recognized. This occurred when using the force command to enable pacman upgrade to kernel 33.
Last edited by lilsirecho (2010-04-11 18:10:10)
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
Solved the problem by re-installing (dd)from backup drive having no pacman-cage installed. This guaranteed pacman db would be recognized in the problem drive.
Pacman then properly installed kernel 33 in the main drive and the system responds correctly.
Prediction...This year will be a very odd year!
Hard work does not kill people but why risk it: Charlie Mccarthy
A man is not complete until he is married..then..he is finished.
When ALL is lost, what can be found? Even bytes get lonely for a little bit! X-ray confirms Iam spineless!
Offline
I had the same problem two days ago, caused by a faulty pacman upgrade. Disk ran full while installing a plenthora of updates on a very outdated box.
pacman -Qi wouldn't recognoze anything, pretty much breaking the whole system. Did a quick reinstall and everything is fine now.
Offline