You are not logged in.
I get the following messages with different files a couple of dozen times:
texlive-bin: /usr/share/man/man1/pdfpun.1.gz existiert im Dateisystem
/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/luatex-bidi.def existiert in 'texlive-core' und 'texlive-langextra'
They hence do not install.
edit: Fixed in new package.
Last edited by misc (2010-07-05 20:52:06)
Offline
You already have some files from the packages you want to install - remove the conflicting files first.
How did you get '/usr/share/man/man1/pdfpun.1.gz' and friends? Did you copy them manually?
Edit: Are you using packages from testing?
Please use 'export LC_MESSAGES="C"' before posting so that error messages are printed out in English.
Last edited by karol (2010-06-27 12:16:20)
Offline
Offline
What does
$ pacman -Qo /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/luatex-bidi.def; pacman -Qo /usr/share/man/man1/pdfpun.1.gz
say?
/e: The first errors come from pdfjam which was moved into texlive-bin/texlive-core.
pacman -Rd pdfjam
to fix it.
Last edited by xduugu (2010-06-27 13:10:16)
Offline
After removing pdfjam I get fewer, but still a lot of errors.
With pdfpun1.gz gone from the list, I ran:
sudo pacman -Qo /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/bookest-xetex-bidi.def; /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/colortbl-xetex-bidi.def
Which gave:
error: failed to read file '/usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/bookest-xetex-bidi.def': No such file or directory
bash: /usr/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/bidi/colortbl-xetex-bidi.def: No such file or directory
Offline
Yeah, sorry. Didn't see it's an other error for these files. Apparently, you cannot install texlive-langextra currently, because it contains files that are already present in texlive-core and texlive-core is a dependency (texlive-langextra → texlive-latexextra → texlive-core). Please file a bug report for this package.
Until the package is fixed, you have to remove texlive-langextra to be able to upgrade texlive-core.
Offline
Indeed, thank you. Jan Steffens appears to already have opened a report, I posted a quick summary of this thread there.
Offline
Thanks for reporting. I'll fix this asap (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/19998#comment63384)
Offline