You are not logged in.
Hello,
I just would like to understand a thing: Does Archlinux 64bits really use more RAM than Archlinux 32bits ?
I've enough RAM, I'm using Openbox with pcmanfm but I saw that I use at leat 300MB of RAM while other Archers say that they use ~200 with other applications started like Chromium, and more daemons than me
It's just to understand, I've 4.0GB of RAM...
Offline
Hello,
I just would like to understand a thing: Does Archlinux 64bits really use more RAM than Archlinux 32bits ?
I've enough RAM, I'm using Openbox with pcmanfm but I saw that I use at leat 300MB of RAM while other Archers say that they use ~200 with other applications started like Chromium, and more daemons than meIt's just to understand, I've 4.0GB of RAM...
Yes, 64 bit systems by definition use significantly more RAM than 32 bit for the same tasks.
Offline
Yeah it uses a few bits more of ram (sorry for poor humor) I ended up on 64bit Arch, (I have 1.7GB of RAM) and it still takes effort to fill that up, its been awhile since i've been on 32bits, but from what I remeber a few things have been fairly faster with it I don't really see why not to if you have 4GB of ram, besides unused ram is wasted ram
Someone call a doctor, my awesome configuration broke again! || To err is human -- to blame it on a computer is even more so.
Offline
There are some good wikipedia articles about 64 bit that will help shed some light. One thing of note: Somewhere between most to no desktop chips are purley 64 bit. For instance:
~ > grep address /proc/cpuinfo
address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
Phenom II 955 (quad-core, of course) is 48 bit in some ways and 64 in others.
Offline
on my very subjective test i noticed that on 64bit ArchLinux my 4GB fill much quicker than my 3GB with 32bit ArchLinux. Other than with 32bit, on 64bit the RAM often got completely filled, too. And since i had no swap partition, the system started to feel sluggish.
Because of some other annoyances I'm back to 32bit with swap (though not used) and i'm very happy with the ram usage.
no place like /home
github
Offline
@skottish: Why, you just blew my mind. Mine is 36 physical/48 virtual. Thank you for the eye opener, I will definitely research this more now
Offline
You can compile your own kernel on i686 with the 'bigmem' option if I'm not mistaken and address >3 Gigs
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
@skottish: Why, you just blew my mind. Mine is 36 physical/48 virtual. Thank you for the eye opener, I will definitely research this more now
My laptop has the same specs as you posted. The above was from my workstation.
Offline
You can compile your own kernel on i686 with the 'bigmem' option if I'm not mistaken and address >3 Gigs
PAE is not a good workaround and should be used unless it's very necessary.
Offline
@flamelab - why is that?
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
@flamelab - why is that?
See this at first
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 48#p640348
I agree with Allan at all points, each time the "PAE" issue comes and goes within the forum regarding the stock i686 kernel26.
And that's because I've tested that myself, it's not worth the try, unless you can't do differently (highly critical, old, i686 machine)
Offline