You are not logged in.
Again Im here ((:
as topis says my grafhic card Intel Corporation 82865G is running on 160fps in glxgears...
installation looked like this :
pacman -S xf86-video-intelgpasswd -a username videoand result:
$ glxgears
731 frames in 5.0 seconds = 145.987 FPS
711 frames in 5.0 seconds = 142.138 FPS
709 frames in 5.0 seconds = 141.796 FPS
724 frames in 5.0 seconds = 144.790 FPS$ glxinfo | grep rendering
direct rendering: YesI know that glxgears should not be used as performance test, but this is really disappointing... In last arch instalation I was getting around 250 and whan I boot into ubuntu 7.04 live cd its around 300fps... something must be wrong!
can someone give me a hand?
thanks ![]()
Offline
Different drivers (versions)?
Does it look nice and plays smooth? Is the interface responsive?
Offline
and which drivers are also available?
I did have this one before...
and yeah,it looks all right.. ![]()
Offline
> and which drivers are also available?
A couple you can find in AUR.
I don't know how much mesa etc. mess with the performance so I can't really help you.
Offline
I have tried :
intel-dri-git 20100130-1
xf86-video-intel-newest 2.12.0-1
xf86-video-intel-git 20100110-1
..from AUR but still getting 160fps...
Whats wrong with that?! is it really so weak GPU?
Offline
I've heard that glxgears is not a benchmark - that's why I asked you is it working OK.
Offline
so tell me how can I figure out if its all right?
even flash movie isnt playing continuously and windows are swlower than cursor when moving
Offline
I use dwm so I don't really have any windows. I don't watch much flash, I prefer to download and watch from my disk.
Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset
Offline
heh, but you know..its not a solution to run form the fight...
whats Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset ?
Offline
heh, but you know..its not a solution to run form the fight...
whats Intel Corporation 82845G/GL[Brookdale-G]/GE Chipset ?
Of course it is a solution - if you say it is. I do, I pick my fights and this is not one. Not yet.
This is my onboard card, an earlier / weaker model wrt yours I suppose.
I paid $100 for the whole computer - IMHO good value for money.
Offline
but I didnt, and with all respect I do not think you're right!
so is here anyone who can halp me make thinks better?
Offline
I have done a little research and I find out that slow performance is caused by using legacy EXA not UXA which is still developing... but it was for 2.6.28 kernel so I dont know how it is in last stable kernel 2.6.34.1.
For now I found an utility called DriConf. This helped me configure 3D acc and things are now bit better.
Does anyone knows something more about how UXA,EXA,GEM works?
Offline
Intel driver only uses UXA, everything else was removed a few versions ago. And glxgears really is not a benchmark, those numbers are meaningless. The question is, does everything work ok, or does it work slower than it used to?
Offline
Intel driver only uses UXA, everything else was removed a few versions ago. And glxgears really is not a benchmark, those numbers are meaningless. The question is, does everything work ok, or does it work slower than it used to?
I've already asked him about it
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 76#p796576
Offline
after some configurations in DriConf ,Quake 3 is playable so its the best solution for now.. ![]()
Offline