You are not logged in.

#151 2010-08-26 18:22:08

petelewis
Trusted User (TU)
From: Birmingham, UK
Registered: 2008-08-14
Posts: 120
Website

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

petelewis wrote:

Akonadi is also extremely slow here, though I think that might be to do with it waiting around for nepomuk.

Oh wow... the speed-up gained by using an external mysql server is ridiculous... I'm guessing there's something wrong with the built-in mysql configuration.


"Cared thou not, thou would have abstained." - Xyne

Offline

#152 2010-09-02 09:00:15

stavallo
Member
Registered: 2010-05-28
Posts: 34

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

I built kdepim 4.4.93 using PKGBUILD and kdepim.install updated by Andrea (I only had to replace the source url which was not working with the ftp.kde.org one). It seems that there are some improvements for the online imap account: faster, deleting email and marking them as read work. Currently, I am trying to create a disconnected imap account. I hope syncing will complete successfully.

I built the packages for x86_64 using makepkg in a real environment (no chroot) with kde 4.5.1 installed. If you want, I can share the packages I built.

Offline

#153 2010-09-02 09:03:22

stavallo
Member
Registered: 2010-05-28
Posts: 34

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

stavallo wrote:

Currently, I am trying to create a disconnected imap account. I hope syncing will complete successfully.

it just failed... :-( akonadi_imap_resource suddenly died

Offline

#154 2010-09-02 09:08:03

ilpianista
Fellow developer
From: Lecce, Italy
Registered: 2007-10-06
Posts: 568
Website

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

so IMAP works? good.
Sorry, but due to some KDE 4.5.1 rebuild (kdesdk, kde-l10n,...) I lost time and I am still building the packages. I hope to release it in some hour for both arches.

Offline

#155 2010-09-02 09:54:05

stavallo
Member
Registered: 2010-05-28
Posts: 34

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

bash wrote:

so IMAP works? good.

Yeah, I would say online (i.e., not cached) IMAP works pretty good. There are still bugs, of course (e.g., some emails are threaded with unknown date in 4.4.93 while being correctly threaded in kmail 4.4.5), but I would say it is usable.

Offline

#156 2010-09-02 16:23:17

karoshi
Member
From: Marburg
Registered: 2008-02-26
Posts: 182

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

stavallo wrote:
stavallo wrote:

Currently, I am trying to create a disconnected imap account. I hope syncing will complete successfully.

it just failed... :-( akonadi_imap_resource suddenly died

restart akonadi server, it will continue then

EDIT:

but in the end, it fails anyway smile

Last edited by karoshi (2010-09-02 17:37:21)


It's a bug planet!

Offline

#157 2010-11-15 12:46:43

gaelic
Member
Registered: 2010-08-01
Posts: 64

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

Hello.

Are there any plans to start this repo again soon, eg. 4.6 beta1 which is coming on Nov18?

Offline

#158 2010-11-15 13:18:06

ilpianista
Fellow developer
From: Lecce, Italy
Registered: 2007-10-06
Posts: 568
Website

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

of course. 24th November (release date) I'll upload the first beta of 4.6 series

Offline

#159 2010-11-15 13:43:14

gaelic
Member
Registered: 2010-08-01
Posts: 64

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

Wow. Thats good news. T-9 smile

Offline

#160 2010-11-15 20:14:04

Wu
Member
Registered: 2009-12-27
Posts: 64

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

is anyone using kmail from trunk? Will it be safe to migrate from 4.4 with the first beta?

Offline

#161 2010-11-16 09:02:09

stavallo
Member
Registered: 2010-05-28
Posts: 34

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

@bash: thank you so much!

@wu: I built kdepim from kde 4.5 branch as of one month ago (since then no big changes were committed to this branch, developers started focusing on trunk) and I have to say it is quite better and faster than kdepim 4.5beta3 (4.4.93). So, I expect kdepim 4.6 to be fast and shining :-)

Offline

#162 2010-11-16 11:51:23

Damnshock
Member
From: Barcelona
Registered: 2006-09-13
Posts: 414

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

stavallo wrote:

@wu: I built kdepim from kde 4.5 branch as of one month ago (since then no big changes were committed to this branch, developers started focusing on trunk) and I have to say it is quite better and faster than kdepim 4.5beta3 (4.4.93). So, I expect kdepim 4.6 to be fast and shining :-)

Well, my main concern is stability rather than "fast and shining" wink

Hope to see improvements soon!

Regards


My blog: blog.marcdeop.com
Jabber ID: damnshock@jabber.org

Offline

#163 2010-11-16 13:35:27

ngoonee
Forum Fellow
From: Between Thailand and Singapore
Registered: 2009-03-17
Posts: 6,856

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

Damnshock wrote:
stavallo wrote:

@wu: I built kdepim from kde 4.5 branch as of one month ago (since then no big changes were committed to this branch, developers started focusing on trunk) and I have to say it is quite better and faster than kdepim 4.5beta3 (4.4.93). So, I expect kdepim 4.6 to be fast and shining :-)

Well, my main concern is stability rather than "fast and shining" wink

Hope to see improvements soon!

Regards

Odd that you're looking at kde-unstable then smile


Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.

Offline

#164 2010-11-16 19:42:06

stavallo
Member
Registered: 2010-05-28
Posts: 34

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

Damnshock wrote:

Well, my main concern is stability rather than "fast and shining" wink

I would say the version I am running is quite stable (using online IMAP here). I don't recall the last time it crashed (if it ever did), messages are sent and received reliably, cpu usage is rather low. I am using this unstable version every day without troubles. There are of course many glitches to solve, but, as I said, I am confident most of them are already solved in trunk.

Offline

#165 2010-11-18 23:22:18

Damnshock
Member
From: Barcelona
Registered: 2006-09-13
Posts: 414

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

ngoonee wrote:

Odd that you're looking at kde-unstable then smile

Checking doesn't mean I'm using it wink


My blog: blog.marcdeop.com
Jabber ID: damnshock@jabber.org

Offline

#166 2010-11-21 11:26:11

ilpianista
Fellow developer
From: Lecce, Italy
Registered: 2007-10-06
Posts: 568
Website

Re: [kde-unstable] is up again

I am updating soprano, akonadi, polkit-qt to development versions that could break your system. This repo shouldn't be used until we announce it in arch-dev-public. Use it at own risk.

Closed.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB