You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
There seems to be limit of 16 CPUs for archlinux kernels. Ubuntu has limit of 8 for i386 version and 64 for x86_64.
May be it's desirable to increase core limit at least for kernel26-lts? (This kernel is for servers, isn't it?) Is there any benefits of core configured exactly sixteen CPUs?
I know, it's easy to change the limit and recompile core, but it's very inconvenient. Just installed archlinux on 4 Hexa-core CPU (total of 24) machine, few days ago. And my colleagues almost convinced me to install ubuntu because of default CPU limit
Last edited by PC (2010-08-28 23:28:31)
Offline
file a feature request.
Offline
I don't think the 2.6.32-lts kernel is specifically aimed at servers. It's aimed at people wanting stability (and more corporate-oriented distributions - Ubuntu uses it in its 10.04 release).
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
You are the exception, please don't put the burden of recompiling on *most* other people... (Not that I'm using the lts kernel at the moment, nor x86_64, but still.)
(I've spent two days building kernels with BFS in order to get a decent performance in games and videos because the kernel devs care more about machines with 4096 CPUs than single-core machines, so I'm a little bit bitter. And it's not yet working for me, apparently.)
Offline
You are the exception, please don't put the burden of recompiling on *most* other people... (Not that I'm using the lts kernel at the moment, nor x86_64, but still.)
(I've spent two days building kernels with BFS in order to get a decent performance in games and videos because the kernel devs care more about machines with 4096 CPUs than single-core machines, so I'm a little bit bitter. And it's not yet working for me, apparently.)
I think you misunderstand what he's requesting. The CPU limit does not affect performance AT ALL, except for slightly increasing (by a few kb) the size of the kernel image.
And I see you've been reading the BFS notes. While I do use BFS myself, I'd advise you that reading its 'documentation' is an extremely one-sided view into kernel development. In any case, it has no relevance into this particular thread.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Edit: don't bother.
Last edited by stqn (2010-08-30 01:58:56)
Offline
Arch Linux has binary packages in its repos, so if a revised package was released, you would just download and install like usual. What would be the problem?
Offline
file a feature request.
+1 for this suggestion: http://bugs.archlinux.org/newtask/proj1
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
Pages: 1