You are not logged in.
Hi,
I have a television able to play movies from a remote source via UPNP. It is on the same LAN as my computer, and I disabled my firewall. I tried to create an UPNP server with both xbmc and mediatomb, but nothing happens in my television: I always get that "No signal" message when trying to discover UPNP servers.
Is there some step I would have missed ? Where could I possibly get log information about what's going on with my UPNP server ?
In case you wonder, I indeed activated the UPNP share in XBMC, and I added the directory containing videos as a source.
Thank you for your answers.
Last edited by koral (2010-08-31 23:32:33)
Offline
You probably didn't multicat the upnp-service over your LAN, so that your television is not picking up the signal.
I have made a 'stub'-article in our wiki for bits and pieces of information relevant to setting up a mediaserver: http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Streaming_media
In my /etc.rc.conf, the network section is configured like this:
hostname="mediaserver"
eth0="dhcp"
INTERFACES=(eth0)
gateway="default gw 192.168.0.1"
multicast="-net 239.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 eth0"
ROUTES=(!gateway multicast)
...
DAEMONS=(... network ...)HTH.
Offline
It didn't fix it. I'm in a 192.168.0.0/24 LAN, so I of course used the following line:
multicast="-net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0"
However, I don't use the network daemon; instead, I use netcfg so maybe it didn't even take into account the ROUTES parameter...
Offline
Up ?
Offline
Perhaps you need to enable UPNP on your router? My aging zyxel router has this option, I've never needed it though.
Offline
Actualy it's already enabled, should have mentionned it earlier.
Offline
Can you see the UPNP shared material with other software/phones/djmount* etc.?
* djmount: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=13817
Chahine/koral: Why two accounts?
Last edited by Ashren (2010-09-04 15:02:19)
Offline
It didn't fix it. I'm in a 192.168.0.0/24 LAN, so I of course used the following line:
multicast="-net 192.168.0.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 eth0"
However, I don't use the network daemon; instead, I use netcfg so maybe it didn't even take into account the ROUTES parameter...
1. I try to use netcfg where I can, but to use multicast, I switched back to plain ol' network.
2. I don't think you should change the ip-address / -range. My network is also on 192.168.x.x.
Zl.
Offline