Arch Linux

Andru

Member

Registered: 2008-09-07

Posts: 23

Audacious2

Why my PKGBUILDs(audacious2 and audacious2-plugins) was deleted from AUR without any email warnings? Because latest version of audacious appeared in extra? But there is some problem - that package[in extra] is incredible pure:
- no cue support
- no chardet with libguess

Can I get some explanation about this situation?

Oh, sorry... wrong section of forum >_<

Last edited by Andru (2010-09-13 11:26:51)

wonder

Developer

From: Bucharest, Romania

Registered: 2006-07-05

Posts: 5,941

Website

Re: Audacious2

i deleted and i didn't send you any warnings because i was too lazy to send yet another email pasting the rules from AUR.

---

Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Andru

Member

Registered: 2008-09-07

Posts: 23

Re: Audacious2

because i was too lazy to send yet another email pasting the rules from AUR.

Ok, I will not ask you to say what rule I broke, but what about doing something with audacious in extra(adding support of chardet and cue)?

Last edited by Andru (2010-09-13 11:52:49)

wonder

Developer

From: Bucharest, Romania

Registered: 2006-07-05

Posts: 5,941

Website

Re: Audacious2

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AUR … ges_to_AUR

Check [core], [extra], and [community] for the package. If it is inside any of those repositories in ANY form, DO NOT submit the package (if the current package is broken or is lacking an included feature then please file a bug report in FlySpray).

Last edited by wonder (2010-09-13 12:10:12)

---

Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Andru

Member

Registered: 2008-09-07

Posts: 23

Re: Audacious2

Check [core], [extra], and [community] for the package. If it is inside any of those repositories in ANY form, DO NOT submit the package (if the current package is broken or is lacking an included feature then please file a bug report in FlySpray).

sorry, I found it after writing my post, but my package have a difference, and was newer ~week ago. So, what can I do now - rename my package to something like audacious-with-cue-and-chardet, or write a "bug" that audacious in extra didn't support cue?

Allan

Pacman

From: Brisbane, AU

Registered: 2007-06-09

Posts: 11,672

Website

Re: Audacious2

Bug report.

---

PGP Key: F99FFE0FEAE999BD | I develop pacman - buy me a drink!

Andru

Member

Registered: 2008-09-07

Posts: 23

Re: Audacious2

Thanks, and sorry for this annoying questions