You are not logged in.
$ fusion-icon
* Detected Session: gnome
* Error: glxinfo not installed!
compiz --replace ccp &
works...
glxinfo does not exists anymore called know glxinfo32?
Please help!!!!
Last edited by killajoe (2010-11-26 09:03:15)
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
glxinfo is in mesa-demos now
Last edited by thestinger (2010-11-26 00:43:10)
Offline
I had the same problem. I tried compiling mesa-demos from the AUR, but it wouldn't work. Failing that, an easy workaround is:
sudo ln -s /usr/bin/glxinfo32 /usr/bin/glxinfo
Offline
mesa-demos is in extra.
You shouldn't link that, you only have glxinfo32 because you have the 32bit mesa installed and it hasn't been split yet.
Last edited by thestinger (2010-11-26 05:02:34)
Offline
Thanks thestinger!
i am on arch64 and installing mesa-demos bring back glxinfo.
And fusion-icon works.
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
fusion-icon in [testing] now has the new dependency, I hope it hits [extra] soon enough or gets fixed in [extra].
Last edited by kralyk (2010-11-26 12:22:10)
Offline
I can confirm that mesa-demos also fixed it for me.
Thanks!
Don't panic !
Offline
fusion-icon in [testing] now has the new dependency, I hope it hits [extra] soon enough or gets fixed in [extra].
thanks a lot for submitting the bug. really. </sarcasm>
p.s i just moved it
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
hm? I submitted no bug...
Offline
he was implying you should submit one next time, instead of waiting for it to be fixed
Offline
Or pretend it was a kernel update that caused the problem, while it really wasn't...
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline
O.K. it is on me to fill a bug but dapolinario do it:
Cancel me not -- for what then shall remain?
Abscissas, some mantissas, modules, modes, A root or two, a torus and a node:
The inverse of my verse, a null domain.
-- Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad
Offline
he was implying you should submit one next time, instead of waiting for it to be fixed
Ah, ok, I get it now.
Sorry, I don't have a good experience with reporting, usually I get some minor to medium telling off for doing so, and seeing that it was already fixed in [testing] I didn't want to risk another embarrassing stupid-bugreport moment, sry...
Offline
Better a bug that's reported one time too many than not at all . It's only by making 'mistakes' that you learn, and filing a bug report isn't considered a mistake, not by a single developer - it's a way to give back to the community and make better software.
Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy
Offline