Considering opening my repo to public.

miqorz · 2005-03-04 21:28:17

Allright, I've started a small repo locally and even uploaded some stuff for various people on irc. Like Emacs-CVS, Firefox from Mozilla.org, Camorama, clearlooks-engine (.4 baby!)

I will gladly build anything (within reason) for you guys.

I'm 16 and starting to get a job so I might not get to it automatically but please, I'm interested in helping the community package wise.

Oh yeah. I'm picking up the bootsplash stuff Brice left off and my custom freetype builds. I may even do regular xfce4-cvs builds!

mdirolf · 2005-03-04 21:41:20

gnome-beagle

miqorz · 2005-03-04 21:53:14

Well that's one of those "within reason" things.

Nothing mono, nothing qt and nothing kde.

phrakture · 2005-03-04 23:31:16

build me a spaceship...

what about vim-cvs.... so emacs-cvs can battle to the death wiith it in your repo

miqorz · 2005-03-05 00:22:36

I would but I don't want to waste my hard drive space building it.

phrakture · 2005-03-05 01:08:55

miqorz wrote:

I would but I don't want to waste my hard drive space building it.

heh, you're already wasting alot with emacs!
buuuuuurn!
8)

dtw · 2005-03-05 08:49:04

i tried emacs....for about 15 seconds...the biggest ugliest piece of shit since gnome

miqorz · 2005-03-05 11:58:53

Wow, can you guys take this idiotic conversation elsewhere?

Dusty · 2005-03-05 18:31:38

miqorz wrote:

Wow, can you guys take this idiotic conversation elsewhere?

Trust me, it really could go *anywhere*....

johnisevil · 2005-03-05 20:17:01

gnome-beagle

I've already got it built. Beagle works quite well but eats up alot of memory. If you want my PKBUILD's of it let me know.

miqorz · 2005-03-06 00:05:00

Allright I got gnomebaker working on my system but the PKGBUILD needs working.. yay?

Not sure what else I'd like to add..

potentials · 2005-05-08 23:03:16

I'd like to have a kernel with bootsplash/gensplash but I don't have the time and knowledge.

What about a generic kernel package with gensplash and some default archlinux theme that would hopefully make it to extra repository (just like the kernel26mm)?

More about gensplash attempts:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … bootsplash

and there's wiki pages:
http://wiki2.archlinux.org/index.php/WI … =BackLinks

http://wiki2.archlinux.org/index.php/ge … ch%20Linux

Think of all others who would like to have such a kernel package

miqorz · 2005-05-08 23:57:41

I don't make kernel packages, I just compile my kernels the old fashion way with just the options I need for my machine.

potentials · 2005-05-09 00:18:43

I don't make kernel packages, I just compile my kernels the old fashion way with just the options I need for my machine.

I know you probably compile your kernel the old way but there's alot who can't.

I will gladly build anything (within reason) for you guys.

I thought you meant building packages that you don't neccessary need yet others would like.

miqorz · 2005-05-09 01:48:31

Well, I don't consider that "within" reason.

The howtos are very easy to follow.

Meshuggin · 2005-05-13 03:07:30

dibblethewrecker wrote:

i tried emacs....for about 15 seconds...the biggest ugliest piece of shit since gnome

wow I agree on emacs, but not in Gnome ... I mean ... I don't like it either but I used it for a long time. Things change, a few months ago I tried to reborn my taste for gnome ... it was just 1 hour and I got bored ... nothing like Fluxbox

Nice initiative miqorz . If you get time you could check out the AUR packages Request section and make some packages required

miqorz · 2005-05-13 03:22:10

Meh, I hate the AUR.

nightfrost · 2005-05-19 17:05:29

I just stumbled over this thread. After reading through all the posts I can't help asking myself whether you really were serious in your first post or not. I mean *nothing* seems to be "within reason" for your taste

(note: I don't have any package requests really; just thought this thread was sort of funny )

miqorz · 2005-05-19 17:49:50

I started this thread with the best of intentions then realized I hated most of the arch community and decided to let them fend for themselves.

Not my fault someone bumped this thing. A mod or someone can feel free to close it.

nightfrost · 2005-05-19 19:05:00

Oh sorry, I didn't realize the last post was almost a week old...

Arch Linux

#1 2005-03-04 21:28:17

Considering opening my repo to public.

#2 2005-03-04 21:41:20

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#3 2005-03-04 21:53:14

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#4 2005-03-04 23:31:16

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#5 2005-03-05 00:22:36

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#6 2005-03-05 01:08:55

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#7 2005-03-05 08:49:04

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#8 2005-03-05 11:58:53

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#9 2005-03-05 18:31:38

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#10 2005-03-05 20:17:01

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#11 2005-03-06 00:05:00

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#12 2005-05-08 23:03:16

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#13 2005-05-08 23:57:41

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#14 2005-05-09 00:18:43

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#15 2005-05-09 01:48:31

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#16 2005-05-13 03:07:30

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#17 2005-05-13 03:22:10

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#18 2005-05-19 17:05:29

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#19 2005-05-19 17:49:50

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

#20 2005-05-19 19:05:00

Re: Considering opening my repo to public.

Board footer