You are not logged in.

#1 2011-02-11 20:29:26

dhave
Arch Linux f@h Team Member
From: Outside the matrix.
Registered: 2005-05-15
Posts: 1,112

grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

I switched to grub2 only a couple of months ago when I installed an SSD as my main boot drive for Arch. It took me a bit of doing to migrate from grub, but I finally got it working and haven't worried with it since.

Now pacman proposes replacing grub2 with grub2-bios. I've tried to read up on this, but I'm confused.

Is this a change I want or not?

Thanks!

Last edited by dhave (2011-02-11 22:43:14)


Donate to Arch!

Tired? There's a nap for that. --anonymous

Offline

#2 2011-02-11 20:49:47

anonymous_user
Member
Registered: 2009-08-28
Posts: 3,059

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

If your computer is not using EFI, then yes.

Offline

#3 2011-02-11 21:04:41

litemotiv
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2008-08-01
Posts: 5,026

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

The grub packages were split, it should be a safe upgrade.


ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

Offline

#4 2011-02-11 21:28:15

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,731
Website

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

+1 - upgraded and works just fine (not an EFI BIOS here).  You will need to vimdiff your /etc/default/grub and your /etc/grub/40_custom if you have it.

Offline

#5 2011-02-11 21:42:19

litemotiv
Forum Fellow
Registered: 2008-08-01
Posts: 5,026

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

graysky wrote:

+1 - upgraded and works just fine (not an EFI BIOS here).  You will need to vimdiff your /etc/default/grub and your /etc/grub/40_custom if you have it.

Afaik the custom config is automatically copied back after the installation?


ᶘ ᵒᴥᵒᶅ

Offline

#6 2011-02-11 22:24:04

dhave
Arch Linux f@h Team Member
From: Outside the matrix.
Registered: 2005-05-15
Posts: 1,112

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

Thanks, guys. Update went without a hitch. Thread marked "solved".


Donate to Arch!

Tired? There's a nap for that. --anonymous

Offline

#7 2011-02-12 00:56:37

graysky
Wiki Maintainer
From: :wq
Registered: 2008-12-01
Posts: 10,731
Website

Re: grub2-bios -- yes or no? [SOLVED]

litemotiv wrote:
graysky wrote:

+1 - upgraded and works just fine (not an EFI BIOS here).  You will need to vimdiff your /etc/default/grub and your /etc/grub/40_custom if you have it.

Afaik the custom config is automatically copied back after the installation?

I had to vimdiff them; here is the pacman.log FYI-

[2011-02-11 16:16] starting full system upgrade
[2011-02-11 16:16] warning: /etc/grub.d/40_custom saved as /etc/grub.d/40_custom.pacsave
[2011-02-11 16:16] warning: /etc/default/grub saved as /etc/default/grub.pacsave
[2011-02-11 16:16] warning: /boot/grub/grub.cfg saved as /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacsave
[2011-02-11 16:16] removed grub2 (1.98-5)
[2011-02-11 16:16] Copying /boot/grub/grub.cfg.pacsave to /boot/grub/grub.cfg
[2011-02-11 16:17] Generating grub.cfg.example config file... done.
[2011-02-11 16:17]  An example config file is created at /boot/grub/grub.cfg.example

Last edited by graysky (2011-02-12 00:57:22)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB