You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
My usbstick is a diva. Sometimes it is recognized and mountable, sometimes not even a node is created. I wonder if a usbstick can get damaged by just beeing connected over a long time...
Frumpus ♥ addict
[mu'.krum.pus], [frum.pus]
Offline
I'm new to the usbstick scene so I can't say regarding damage due to being left connected for long periods. However, I can say that I noticed weird things going on with my system when I left them plugged in all the time, so I started unplugging them immediately after transferring files to them.
It would be interesting to hear from others on this.
oz
Offline
i find if its formatted in windows it can fubar things.
sometimes i try mount it, and it wont. then try mount again immediately after , like it needs double mount. and it works.
i think its like witchcraft. camera cards can be even worse !
my scene :
mount /dev/sda1 /mnt/usbstick
sometimes rejects : so
mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /mnt/usbstick
Offline
pink: I have never heard of a usbstick that has taken damage of being connected for a long time...
could there be that the usbstick is not fully attached to the computer? (not totally fitting (sorry for not beng very descriptive, can't find the right english word)
http://www.linuxportalen.com -> Linux Help portal for Linux and ArchLinux (in swedish)
Dell Inspiron 8500
Kernel 2.6.14-archck1 (selfcompiled)
Enlightenment 17
Offline
(not totally fitting (sorry for not beng very descriptive, can't find the right english word)
Maybe plugged?... I'm not sure either...
And where were all the sportsmen who always pulled you though?
They're all resting down in Cornwall
writing up their memoirs for a paper-back edition
of the Boy Scout Manual.
Offline
I've had no problems with usb sticks and linux. I've created udev rules to make special nodes for mine when plugged in (/dev/usbstick) and I've never had a problem with the node not being created.
Offline
Pages: 1