You are not logged in.

#1 2011-04-26 20:46:50

Montague
Banned
Registered: 2010-06-24
Posts: 93

 

 

Last edited by Montague (2015-07-28 02:33:10)

Offline

#2 2011-04-28 16:30:58

Montague
Banned
Registered: 2010-06-24
Posts: 93

Re:  

 

Last edited by Montague (2015-07-28 02:33:28)

Offline

#3 2011-04-29 04:42:58

skodabenz
Banned
From: Tamilnadu, India
Registered: 2010-04-11
Posts: 382

Re:  

grub2-bios depends on grub2-common, so effectively you have choice between grub2-bios and grub2-bios-bzr. I suggest using grub2-bios-bzr as it is more up-to-date. I have not tried btrfs booting though.


My new forum user/nick name is "the.ridikulus.rat" .

Offline

#4 2011-04-29 16:23:00

Montague
Banned
Registered: 2010-06-24
Posts: 93

Re:  

 

Last edited by Montague (2015-07-28 02:33:38)

Offline

#5 2011-06-29 02:21:18

extofme
Member
From: here + now
Registered: 2009-10-10
Posts: 174
Website

Re:  

ah man ... sorry bud.  i didn't see this thread awhile back or i would've helped you out.

... yeah, what's in the wiki *works*, but i or another need to revisit it.  installing without partition sounds l33t and all ... but it's a huge PITA as you can see.  the stuff you saw in fdisk is not real -- it's just fdisk trying to make sense of the partitionless disk.  i got bit by my own setup when LZO compression came out and BANG! none of my machines booted :-)

there wasn't really a straghtforward way to fix it anyways im afraid, mostly due to lack of partition table.  btrfs can be shrunk, then the table altered/etc, but not in this case.  the only reason it works at all is because syslinux is installed inthe the MBR (first ~1MB of disk) ... and no FS ventures there -- ever.  so nowadays it really best to use GPT partitions with a separate /boot.  it also will allow for multi-drive roots anyway ... just need to eventually crank out a mkinitcpio-btrfs update ...

oh and the change from local.pool.btrfs -> btrfs-root was purely pragmatic -- its makes more sense with the reality of it all, and is shorter :-) -- the hook itself doesn't use that yet.  the label you had didn't matter too much either since UUID can be used.  you can change the label with `btrfstune` but you have to compile it yourself as of now and it's flaky as hell ... there is a huge updates coming to btrfs-progs (per mailing list) so soon i *think* the `btrfs` tool can handle label changes.

C Anthony


what am i but an extension of you?

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB