Arch Linux

Cdh

Member

Registered: 2009-02-03

Posts: 1,098

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

I tried to look at the default kernelconfig and did I understand correctly that CONFIG_ATH9K_PCI is disabled?

Line 1970, x86_64 config file for 3.0:

CONFIG_ATH9K_PCI=y

And:

$ zgrep CONFIG_ATH9K_PCI /proc/config.gz 
$ uname -r
2.6.39-ARCH

No such thing as CONFIG_ATH9K_PCI in 2.6.39 .

It's ok. I already saw it enabled in the git repository.

---

฿ 18PRsqbZCrwPUrVnJe1BZvza7bwSDbpxZz

capoeira

Member

From: Vila Velha - Brasil

Registered: 2010-05-25

Posts: 470

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

I requested an AUR for the realtime patch: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php … 91#p964791

graysky

Wiki Maintainer

From: :wq

Registered: 2008-12-01

Posts: 10,674

Website

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

This PKG entered [testing] - interesting to see that apparently, there isn't an ARCH patchset with this series...

source=(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/linux-${_basekernel}.tar.bz2
        #ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/patch-${pkgver}.bz2
        # the main kernel config files
        config config.x86_64
        # standard config files for mkinitcpio ramdisk
        ${pkgname}.preset
        fix-i915.patch)

Last edited by graysky (2011-07-24 11:59:13)

---

CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck  • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs

.:B:.

Forum Fellow

Registered: 2006-11-26

Posts: 5,819

Website

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

$ uname -a
Linux hermes 3.0.0-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Jul 23 23:17:54 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i3 CPU M 380 @ 2.53GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

---

Got Leenucks? :: Arch: Power in simplicity :: Get Counted! Registered Linux User #392717 :: Blog thingy

skottish

Forum Fellow

From: Here

Registered: 2006-06-16

Posts: 7,942

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

Another simple kernel upgrade thanks to the Arch team. I didn't even have to upgrade syslinux.cfg right away. I did, but I didn't have to. Sweet.

fsckd

Forum Fellow

Registered: 2009-06-15

Posts: 4,173

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

hokay, i guess burg users might see a duplicate entry for the 3.0.0 kernel with that symlink and all; i will try to get something done today, if i don't i grant you all free permission to beat me up

Last edited by fsckd (2011-07-24 16:30:07)

---

aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies

karol

Archivist

Registered: 2009-05-06

Posts: 25,440

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

hokay, i guess burg users might see a duplicate entry for the 3.0.0 kernel with that symlink and all; i will try to get something done today, if i don't i grant you all free permission to beat me up

Today? In any particular timezone?

[karol@black ~]$ LC_ALL=C TZ="Iran" date
Sun Jul 24 21:26:52 IRDT 2011

Now where did I put my robe and wizard hat boxing gloves ...

jelly

Administrator

From: /dev/null

Registered: 2008-06-10

Posts: 714

Re: no posts about kernel 3.0 yet?

Another simple kernel upgrade thanks to the Arch team. I didn't even have to upgrade syslinux.cfg right away. I did, but I didn't have to. Sweet.

Yeah thanks to that silly symlink, well i guess it would be less trouble for not knowing users

---

dotfiles