You are not logged in.

#326 2011-07-29 08:48:22

ArchArael
Member
Registered: 2005-06-14
Posts: 504

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Skyalmian wrote:

It's been essentially the same for ages: openbox-git + tint2-svn, humanity-icon-theme, XFCE's Terminal (using Terminus font), and Tahoma 8 for GTK+.

Why openbox-git and not the stable openbox? Is there some new feature worth the effort?

Last edited by ArchArael (2011-07-29 08:48:51)

Offline

#327 2011-07-29 11:54:19

mips1
Member
Registered: 2008-01-02
Posts: 99

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Mind sharing the themes & configs please?

Offline

#328 2011-07-29 13:25:50

Rumor
Member
From: Albany, NY
Registered: 2006-07-07
Posts: 638

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Jatoskep wrote:

Is your terminal only transparent because you're looking at it in the Gnome3 expose thing (not sure the proper name for it tongue)
Mine will show as transparent in that but unless it's maximized I can't use it transparent, really been bugging me. I saw a bug about it from a while ago, but am hoping there's a way to fix that now.

Yes, it is only transparent in the expose thing (I like that term). I haven't been able to remove the background shadow from the window in normal viewing mode. it bugs me too, but I like Gnome 3 so much that I've accepted it. It'll get fixed at some point in the future, I am sure.

Sorry to get your hopes up :-P


Smarter than a speeding bullet
My Goodreads profile

Offline

#329 2011-07-29 19:11:39

aluser
Member
Registered: 2011-01-16
Posts: 119

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

benbooth493 wrote:

Here's mine smile
http://img8.imageshack.us/img8/7963/shyrka.png

Still a few little bit and bobs to fix and finish, but my setup is quick and simple.

Hope you enjoy.

benbooth493

P.S. Any tips whole-heartedly received!

can you share the wallpaper?

Offline

#330 2011-07-30 04:31:12

Skyalmian
Member
Registered: 2009-06-28
Posts: 121

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

ArchArael wrote:

Why openbox-git and not the stable openbox? Is there some new feature worth the effort?

I use it...just cause? tongue Nearly all of the software I directly use is a git/hg/svn build unless up pops a major issue or incompleteness that breaks it (which has happened before)... (This post for example was made using Chromium snapshot build "15.0.838.0 (Developer Build 94544 Linux) custom".)
It actually doesn't get updated all that often: @http://git.icculus.org/?p=dana/openbox.git;a=summary
Besides, there's the "exciting" factor to snapshot builds: "What bleeding edge change did last night's build add that is noticeable?" tongue Makes me look forward to updating, lol.

I did go overboard once with snapshot build packages and had to scale back. With the exception of nightly kernel26-drm-radeon-testing and all [radeon] graphics driver packages, core system packages are either stable or testing. smile

Offline

#331 2011-07-30 06:36:08

Paul-S
Member
From: Wales
Registered: 2008-02-04
Posts: 353

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

XMonad


tOW9xOA.jpg

tOW9xOQ.jpg

Cheers
Paul-S

Offline

#332 2011-07-30 20:44:46

DustinCasler
Member
From: Dallas, Texas
Registered: 2011-03-27
Posts: 50

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

I LOVE that Breaking Bad wallpaper! Is it on the show's site?

Offline

#333 2011-07-30 20:56:06

Paul-S
Member
From: Wales
Registered: 2008-02-04
Posts: 353

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

DustinCasler it was from Reddit in the wallpaper section.

tOW96dg.jpg

Cheers
Paul-S

Offline

#334 2011-07-30 21:08:11

DustinCasler
Member
From: Dallas, Texas
Registered: 2011-03-27
Posts: 50

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Thanks Paul. I'm on Reddit quite a bit but somehow have missed the wallpaper subreddit. I'll go look now.

Offline

#335 2011-07-31 11:13:31

ganastasiou
Member
Registered: 2010-02-03
Posts: 56

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Awesome of course.

[Clean]:
tOXA3eQ

Dirty:
tOXA3eA

Offline

#336 2011-07-31 16:28:21

na12
Member
From: /home/serbia
Registered: 2008-12-23
Posts: 752

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

screenshot-19.jpg

Openbox,bmpanel2,conky

Offline

#337 2011-07-31 18:00:45

examon
Member
Registered: 2011-05-07
Posts: 208

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

I'm not using openbox but I have to say that this looks really nice, I like it!

Offline

#338 2011-07-31 18:29:33

mips1
Member
Registered: 2008-01-02
Posts: 99

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Sorry, misread a post when replying.

Last edited by mips1 (2011-07-31 18:31:03)

Offline

#339 2011-07-31 18:33:24

na12
Member
From: /home/serbia
Registered: 2008-12-23
Posts: 752

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

mips1 wrote:
na12 wrote:

Openbox,bmpanel2,conky

Share your tint2 config please.

It is bmpanel2. Theme you can find at box-look.org.

Offline

#340 2011-07-31 21:12:09

Unia
Member
From: Stockholm, Sweden
Registered: 2010-03-30
Posts: 2,486
Website

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Sorry for the late replies, have been on holiday without internet.

Varg wrote:
Unia wrote:

Could you share your ncmpcpp config? Promise I won't forget it's from you this time! tongue

Sure: http://pastie.org/2258341 but I'll be watching you young man tongue

Thanks! I'll just put your name in there so I won't forget tongue

sam87 wrote:

still wmfs...not my normal setup but i like it anyway
http://ompldr.org/vOWxnbQ


my usual setup, i just missed it smile
http://ompldr.org/vOW1kOQ

Care to share both status.sh files?


If you can't sit by a cozy fire with your code in hand enjoying its simplicity and clarity, it needs more work. --Carlos Torres

Offline

#341 2011-07-31 22:26:27

Mr_ED-horsey
Member
From: Portland, OR
Registered: 2011-04-06
Posts: 177

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Clean:
clean-thumb.png?t=1312150541

Dirty:
dirty-thumb.png?t=1312150656

Openbox + Tint2 + wbar. Enabled tiling windows using pytyle2 from the aur. TechniX window theme from box-look and TechniX gtk theme from gnome-look. No conky... Cuz I just don't care about it... Awoken icon theme also from the aur... Tint2 is 99% the default config. I just made it stretch across the entire screen, changed the clock and got rid of the rounded borders on the panel background.

By the way, I really like pytyle2. I've used both pure tiling window managers like awesome and regular ones like openbox but now I have the best of both worlds smile

Last edited by Mr_ED-horsey (2011-07-31 22:27:55)


Desktop: Fedora 21 Mate + Compiz [x86_64] on 2 TiB HDD  /  Windows 7 Professional [x86_64] on 500 GiB HDD
Laptop: Arch Linux + Openbox [i686] 120 GiB SSD on Acer c720 Chromebook

Offline

#342 2011-08-01 05:11:19

Celtore
Member
From: Ontario
Registered: 2010-08-21
Posts: 3

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

tOXBraA

Openbox + Tint2 + Conky.

Fairly basic idea, but I think it's overall rather pleasing to the eyes. I may plan to add some more conky scripts on the right side of the screen to make it feel a bit less empty.


love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we’ll change the world. ~ Jack Layton

Offline

#343 2011-08-01 06:03:59

triplesquarednine
Member
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 630

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

my new install. arch64 + gnome3 + compiz 0.9.5 (git, scott moreau build scripts) + cairo-dock 2.4.x + kernel26-ck + ulatencyd.

1st shot - nautilus and terminal ... the gtk3 theme is my own (should probably put it on gnome-look but i never really finished it) ... customized .bashrc ~ lots of color coding (gcc, sh, etc), system info and archey3 as a greeter wink

tOXBrdQ

2nd shot - clean desktop. 1 dock, an analog clock on the wall and a trash.

tOXBrdg

3rd screenshot - compiz / expo plugin ... 4 workspaces.  using the g'mic plugin in gimp, i added a small black frame to my wallpaper. then disabled 'reflections', distance between workspaces = zero and disabled lighting/highlighting in expo. 

tOXBreA

i add frames to all desktop wallpaper in order to achieve this effect. personally, i think it looks much more professional ~ being as when you drag applications from workspace to workspace, they actually appear on top, rather than underneath the 'black separators' in expo. ~ as they are just an illusion on my desktop wink

i'm pretty happy with this desktop so far, very simple and fast.

Last edited by triplesquarednine (2011-08-01 06:06:43)

Offline

#344 2011-08-01 12:13:11

sam87
Member
From: down the rabbit hole
Registered: 2009-09-26
Posts: 141

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Unia wrote:

Sorry for the late replies, have been on holiday without internet.

Varg wrote:
Unia wrote:

Could you share your ncmpcpp config? Promise I won't forget it's from you this time! tongue

Sure: http://pastie.org/2258341 but I'll be watching you young man tongue

Thanks! I'll just put your name in there so I won't forget tongue

sam87 wrote:

still wmfs...not my normal setup but i like it anyway
http://ompldr.org/vOWxnbQ


my usual setup, i just missed it smile
http://ompldr.org/vOW1kOQ

Care to share both status.sh files?

Sure, its just conky piped to dzen2
here you go http://ompldr.org/vOXBvMw and here is the conky-dzen2 startup script http://ompldr.org/iOXBvNA


what i cannot build, i do not understand

Offline

#345 2011-08-04 00:45:38

rufflove
Member
From: Holmfirth, UK
Registered: 2010-11-22
Posts: 96

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

triplesquarednine wrote:

my new install. arch64 + gnome3 + compiz 0.9.5 (git, scott moreau build scripts) + cairo-dock 2.4.x + kernel26-ck + ulatencyd.

Have you found kernel26-ck + ulatencyd to be more responsive than kernel26-ck + bfs?


"Its too big and too slow"

Offline

#346 2011-08-04 01:10:51

triplesquarednine
Member
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 630

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

rufflove wrote:
triplesquarednine wrote:

my new install. arch64 + gnome3 + compiz 0.9.5 (git, scott moreau build scripts) + cairo-dock 2.4.x + kernel26-ck + ulatencyd.

Have you found kernel26-ck + ulatencyd to be more responsive than kernel26-ck + bfs?

i'm using bfs / bfq with ulatencyd ...

(3:503)$ cat /proc/cgroups
#subsys_name    hierarchy    num_cgroups    enabled
cpuset    3    1    1
ns    0    1    1
memory    1    7    1
devices    0    1    1
freezer    0    1    1
net_cls    0    1    1
blkio    2    37    1
*bfqio*    0    1    1

io scheduler

cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler
noop deadline cfq [bfq] 

forget howto check the cpu scheduler from the commandline, off hand, but i'm using it. i can quickly look and see;

/proc/sys/kernel/iso_cpu
/proc/sys/kernel/rr_interval

obviously, these 2 files are BFS only and aren't found here unless BFS is being used.

Ulatencyd works fine with bfq / bfs ... you don't have to pick one over the other.  I also am using 'rtirq' on this machine. more on that, over here;

https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=123403

it used to be a script only usable for RT users, but you can use it in 2.6.39+ ... since i do a lot of audio stuff, it's handy, i basically use this one kernel for everything wink

Last edited by triplesquarednine (2011-08-04 01:13:11)

Offline

#347 2011-08-04 01:57:58

rufflove
Member
From: Holmfirth, UK
Registered: 2010-11-22
Posts: 96

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

Now I'm confused: BFS doesn't support cgroups as far as I'm aware, so how is running ulatencyd of benefit? I get the feeling I'm missing something here!

I'm using jack2+libffado with an external firewire soundcard on my desktop system (I was relieved to discover gnome-settings-daemon-nopulse), hence my curiosity. I sometimes hook the firewire card up to my less capable htpc downstairs and it has problems with jack2+libffado. kernel26-ck didn't help, so I'm looking around for options; your 'rtirq' info looks encouraging - thanks! smile


"Its too big and too slow"

Offline

#348 2011-08-04 02:22:47

triplesquarednine
Member
Registered: 2011-04-12
Posts: 630

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

rufflove wrote:

Now I'm confused: BFS doesn't support cgroups as far as I'm aware, so how is running ulatencyd of benefit? I get the feeling I'm missing something here!

I'm using jack2+libffado with an external firewire soundcard on my desktop system (I was relieved to discover gnome-settings-daemon-nopulse), hence my curiosity. I sometimes hook the firewire card up to my less capable htpc downstairs and it has problems with jack2+libffado. kernel26-ck didn't help, so I'm looking around for options; your 'rtirq' info looks encouraging - thanks! smile

ya, at one point BFS didn't support cgroups at all... that being said, cgroups still worked ~ just without the CPU bit. however, when i view my cgroups mount it is showing CPU related stuff in action, so it would seem that now it does work...? but regardless, the MEM and IO cgroups would still work even if BFS itself doesn't, so it is of benefit and i use it. obviously, i also use sched_iso on jackd as well.

as for 'rtirq' ~ it will probably be of help to you, as you can prioritize your firewire with it. as my other post suggests, since the merging of 'forced interrupt thread handlers' from RT into mainline, passing 'threadirqs' and using rtirq should give you some of the benefits that you would normally use RT for, it should reduce xruns.

I am using usb2.0 soundcard and i don't really get xruns on 2.6.39-ck. it works well. smile

Offline

#349 2011-08-05 02:54:08

rufflove
Member
From: Holmfirth, UK
Registered: 2010-11-22
Posts: 96

Re: July 2011 Screenshots

The cpu related entries are present under /sys/fs/cgroup for me too, but I'm not convinced:

[nat@leonard ~]$ cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler; ulatency tree
noop deadline [cfq] bfq 
error: tree does not exist

I'm out of my depth when it comes to cgroups.. neutral You tell me! Anyhow, I have rtirq up and running (just added 'firewire' to RTIRQ_NAME_LIST). Overruns seem to occur arbitrarily on my htpc, so I'll need to spend some time with it to see if there is an improvement.. Cheers again. smile


"Its too big and too slow"

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB