Does Flash Still Require AUR?

Carlwill · 2011-08-23 17:28:09

It's been sometime since I tried to use Arch Linux and I'm checking back to see if there are Adobe flash plugin packages now available outside of the AUR? I remember at one point the package was in extra or something of that nature. Do we still need to build this package via the AUR?

ataraxia · 2011-08-23 17:31:56

It's in extra for i686 and multilib for x86_64 right now. (On x86_64 it installs the 32-bit version under nspluginwrapper.)

Wintervenom · 2011-08-23 17:35:58

If you use 64-bit Arch and wish to use the recently-updated native 64-bit version, it is in the AUR as flashplugin-beta. Otherwise, the 32-bit version is in [multilib] (wrapped with nspluginwrapper) and [extra].

Last edited by Wintervenom (2011-08-23 17:40:30)

karol · 2011-08-23 17:36:53

Which part of the wiki article is unclear?

Carlwill · 2011-08-23 18:47:23

karol wrote:

Which part of the wiki article is unclear?

I didn't think to check the Wiki and I have found it to be at times outdated especially when it comes to things like Flash. Thanks for reminding me to check so I don't inconvenience you again.

zendeavor · 2011-09-03 03:50:28

Carlwill wrote:

karol wrote:
Which part of the wiki article is unclear?
I didn't think to check the Wiki and I have found it to be at times outdated especially when it comes to things like Flash. Thanks for reminding me to check so I don't inconvenience you again.

sounds fantastic.

Arch Linux

#1 2011-08-23 17:28:09

Does Flash Still Require AUR?

#2 2011-08-23 17:31:56

Re: Does Flash Still Require AUR?

#3 2011-08-23 17:35:58

Re: Does Flash Still Require AUR?

#4 2011-08-23 17:36:53

Re: Does Flash Still Require AUR?

#5 2011-08-23 18:47:23

Re: Does Flash Still Require AUR?

#6 2011-09-03 03:50:28

Re: Does Flash Still Require AUR?

Board footer