You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Today nvidia released a new driver with "older" version, which is, however, compatible with X.Org 1.11. Does that mean that will have nvidia-275xx package similar to nvidia-173xx?
Offline
You could always write a PKGBUILD for it and upload to the AUR. If a trusted user wants to pick it up, it'll go into [community].
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
You could always write a PKGBUILD for it and upload to the AUR. If a trusted user wants to pick it up, it'll go into [community].
Sure, but I wanted to know what the arch packagers intend to do. After all, 275.28 supports xorg-server 1.11, and as far as I understand xorg-server 1.11 has not landed in [extra] yet, only because of it's incompatibility with nvidia-280.
Last edited by dimitar (2011-09-07 21:20:01)
Offline
Here are the AUR packages. I had to split nvidia-utils into nvidia-utils and opencl-nvidia, since AUR cannot accept two strings in pkgname. These are my first packages, so feel free to add comments and improvement suggestions (although, they should be directed to the nvidia package maintainers, because I copied the PKGBUILDs from [extra]).
Offline
i won't do anything with that version. They didn't drop any support from the current driver to do a nvidia-275xx. I don't think that driver will support the future versions of xorg-server 1.11.
Waiting for a new 280.x or 285.x version is the best thing.
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
i won't do anything with that version. They didn't drop any support from the current driver to do a nvidia-275xx. I don't think that driver will support the future versions of xorg-server 1.11.
Waiting for a new 280.x or 285.x version is the best thing.
Thanks for the reply! I must admit, that I was really puzzled when I saw this version of the driver and I suppose waiting for 28x.x is the most appropriate thing to do. I'll remove the nvidia-275xx AUR packages when the new version of the nvidia driver lands in [extra].
Offline
Just for info: it seems that 275xx will actually be a "long-lived branch": http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606
Offline
Thanks for AUR packages , I have problems I suspect are related to nvidia driver on my new system (firefox and nautilus segfaulting randomly when using 280.13) and 275xx seems to work without any issues. I like the idea of a long-lived branch that only receives bug fixes and "safe" new features, so double thumbs up to including it in [extra] (already voted on AUR
).
Offline
Just for info: it seems that 275xx will actually be a "long-lived branch": http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=122606
Yes, it is the main idea. We have widely used lts package for kernel. Similarly it is a big sense to have lts variation for other widely used package - nvidia driver
Last edited by student975 (2011-09-17 22:04:37)
"I exist" is the best myth I know..
Offline
Pages: 1