You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I've been using pypanel as my panel in Openbox pretty much ever since I started using Arch. I've been kind of disappointed with the fact I am unable to right-click on the tasks and close them (A windows-like habit I haven't been able to shake). However, it has been a great panel that's done what I needed it to do.
Recently I went through the Arch wiki for Openbox Themes and Apps and have been trying out a bunch of new panels. I wanted something configurable (I need launchers and a menu), nice-looking, and not too clunky. I tested a few of the panels (such as tint2 and xfce-panel), while just browsing over screenshots of most, and finally just came upon fbpanel.
Fbpanel is everything I want in a panel. Firstly, I was happy to see it has an optional menu of its own (where it pulls applications from /usr/share/applications), but I decided I'd rather use my openbox menu since it already has so many custom items in it. All I had to do was remove fbpanel's menu and make a launcher for openbox's menu.
On top of this, fbpanel has several little plugins, such as a tray which displays window positions of each workspace, cpu and memory status monitoring, AND!!! you can right-click on tasks to close/iconify them
Plus, it looks quite nice with its pseudo-transparency and curved edges.
I am very happy with fbpanel :D
Offline
Hadn't noticed this testimonial earlier.
All I can really say is: +1 !
It's the most comprehensive panel I have found to work with Openbox, and there is still development activity.
Offline
Fbpanel has just one big problem - kill it (or it crashes) and all apps launched from it go down with it. Lxpanel (initially a fork of fbpanel) doesn't behave like that. And I bet other panels don't either. Otherwise yeah, fbpanel is nice. Also, does it now have an alsa mixer or is it still oss?
Last edited by Gusar (2011-09-03 01:31:19)
Offline
I like fbpanel too, on my netbook. Very few dependencies. I haven't noticed the crash symptoms yet but I'll look into it. When editing the default config file I restart it with; killall -USR1 fbpanel and it seems to not crash the open apps.
Offline
No crashing problems if you use what swanson mentions: killall -USR1 fbpanel
I use Volumeicon (https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=35793) for ALSA volume control.
Offline
Im not seeing what you guys are talking about. I am running OpenBox and I have TWO fbpanels running (one on each X-session- I run dual head separate X)- if I do killall fbpanel, both panels die as expected, but all my apps remain open. The only thing odd is that pidgin pops up (the buddy list). When I restart fbpanel on each screen, all my existing apps go right back into the taskbar as if nothing happened.
I have tried everything else, and especially for dual-head separate X, there are only 3 options: 1) fbpanel 2) tint2 3) xfce4-panel. Tint2 has no menu option (though it has launchers), and I prefer to have my OpenBox menu a simple quicklaunch list of frequently used things as opposed to containing everything on my system. Xfce4-panel has a weird bug with OpenBox where trying to click-minimize a window on my second screen causes it only to lose focus and not minimize. Fbpanel works well on both screens, supports a system tray on each screen, looks good, has launchers and a menu, and even has a popup calender on the clock! Also like Tint2, it supports psuedo-transparency- I use pytyle on both my screens, and compositing doesnt play well with pytyle at times; I can still have transparency while having the rock-solid aspects of a non-composited desktop.
On top of these things, it is light on resources, dependencies, its rock-stable, and is in active development. Definitely a +1 for me. Im surprised that soooo many people talk about Tint2 and pypanel as the panels to use for openbox.. Id think more people would be using fbpanel.
Offline
Agreed ... no problems with running or restarting the fb-panel.
I use a basic Fluxbox install built over Openbox, and I love everything about Fluxbox WM
At first, because, I was more familiar with Openbox, I continued to use the tint2 panel with Fluxbox.
Then, I saw the light ... the fb-panel is awesome. Displays everything I need.
You can see, a few, of my Fluxbox screenshots here: http://www.lostinthebox.com/viewtopic.php?f=65&t=35733
Many, many more pics of my Fluxbox desktop on http://vrkalak.deviantart.com
On top of these things, the fbpanel is light on resources, dependencies, its rock-stable, and is in active development. Definitely a +1 for me. I'm surprised that soooo many people talk about Tint2 and pypanel as the panels to use for Openbox ... more people would be using fbpanel.
I am in total agreement with this statement. Openbox users should be considering using the fbpanel as a viable replacement for tint2.
Last edited by vrkalak (2011-09-19 23:44:11)
Fluxbox Junkie!! | <Debian> <ArchLinux> | my DeviantART
Offline
Glad to see others agree that it's an awesome panel
I've been using it for over 5 months now and don't think I could ever go back to any of the other panels.
It looks so nice, has all the features I need, and is light on resources.
Offline
Grab the SVN version from the AUR and magically a right click on a taskbar button gives you the new option to move to a particular workspace! Unfortunately, at least on Openbox, the "All Workspaces" option doesnt seem to work, but the other options do.
Last edited by GSF1200S (2011-11-12 20:23:15)
Offline
! Epic!
Getting better by the day.
Offline
Pages: 1