ligthttp

darroyX · 2010-07-01 14:54:28

Hi archers, i'm noob in this distribution, my question is:
somebody install ligthttp? and if it's is very functional for all.

Thanks,
Regards.
D.

crankyadmin · 2010-07-01 15:02:44

Depends what you want to do. For most usage cases yes. But can take a little more work to get things like django going on it.

ralvez · 2010-07-01 15:21:07

If you are a developer that needs a testing environment I would go for Apache server; it's just as easy to set up and it's the measuring bar for most web apps.

R.

Cdh · 2010-07-01 21:35:59

What does "functional" mean to you?
It's a very nive webserver that supports php via fastcgi and mysql... There are also many modules in the config I never used. It has also url rewriting but I never used that.

scarecrow · 2010-07-01 21:46:26

You could give Cherokee and Engine X a try.
The former is lightweight but fullfeatured, and has a web based admin module which makes setup very easy.
nginx is also easy to setup (not via web ui though), and behaves great on heavy traffic.

darroyX · 2010-07-01 22:35:34

What does "functional" mean to you?

postgresql, drupal, phpbb, etc...

You could give Cherokee and Engine X a try.

I'll do,

thanks all for your answers.
Regards,
D.

Cdh · 2010-07-02 04:52:06

darroyX wrote:

What does "functional" mean to you?
postgresql, drupal,

How about googling?
http://www.ciardhubh.de/node/3
Yes it's from 2008.

darroyX wrote:

phpbb, etc...

I see no reason why it shouldn't.

The only issue is that the rewrite configuration differs from that of apache, I guess.

Arch Linux

#1 2010-07-01 14:54:28

ligthttp

#2 2010-07-01 15:02:44

Re: ligthttp

#3 2010-07-01 15:21:07

Re: ligthttp

#4 2010-07-01 21:35:59

Re: ligthttp

#5 2010-07-01 21:46:26

Re: ligthttp

#6 2010-07-01 22:35:34

Re: ligthttp

#7 2010-07-02 04:52:06

Re: ligthttp

Board footer