Please put Ptokax In AUR.

shadyabhi · 2010-09-06 07:09:36

Its a DC HUB Server. For more info see http://www.ptokax.org/index.html

I am having hard time compiling it..

fukawi2 · 2010-09-06 07:31:31

I tried, but that package is poorly packaged. I can't get it to compile either.

shadyabhi · 2010-09-06 11:49:49

fukawi2 wrote:

I tried, but that package is poorly packaged. I can't get it to compile either.

I could compile it finally..

Steps.

1. DOwnload the tinyxml source and paste in the ./tinyxml directory.
2. Compile it with the makefile already provided with the "ptokax" source & delete the Makefile of tinyxml.
3. then goto root of ptokax source and make some changes in the makefile. (I am uploading the compilable source code.. use diff to see changes.)

Pls put it to AUR..

Link to WORKING SOURCE CODE: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7728421/PtokaX.zip

MadCatMk2 · 2010-09-06 11:55:22

shadyabhi wrote:

fukawi2 wrote:
I tried, but that package is poorly packaged. I can't get it to compile either.
I could compile it finally..
Steps.
1. DOwnload the tinyxml source and paste in the ./tinyxml directory.
2. Compile it with the makefile already provided with the "ptokax" source & delete the Makefile of tinyxml.
3. then goto root of ptokax source and make some changes in the makefile. (I am uploading the compilable source code.. use diff to see changes.)
Pls put it to AUR..
Link to WORKING SOURCE CODE: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/7728421/PtokaX.zip

I'm making a PKGBUILD as we speak.

Xyne · 2010-09-06 12:06:13

Instead of hosting modified source files, why don't you include the patch with the PKGBUILD instead?

MadCatMk2 · 2010-09-06 17:00:13

Xyne wrote:

Instead of hosting modified source files, why don't you include the patch with the PKGBUILD instead?

Great idea.

Here it is: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40586
First PKGBUILD I wrote from the ground up so if anyone has some objection/comment let's hear it please.

shadyabhi · 2010-09-06 17:25:40

MadCatMk2 wrote:

Xyne wrote:
Instead of hosting modified source files, why don't you include the patch with the PKGBUILD instead?
Great idea.
Here it is: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40586
First PKGBUILD I wrote from the ground up so if anyone has some objection/comment let's hear it please.

Add more dependencies as said in the compile.txt of ptokax source.

PtokaX need for compiling packages (and url where to find sources when package is not available in your OS):
g++ (name in Debian) | http://gcc.gnu.org/
make (name in Debian) | http://www.gnu.org/software/make/
liblua5.1 + liblua5.1-dev (names in Debian) | http://www.lua.org
zlib1g + zlib1g-dev (names in Debian) | http://zlib.net
TinyXml | http://sourceforge.net/projects/tinyxml

MadCatMk2 · 2010-09-06 17:43:30

shadyabhi wrote:

MadCatMk2 wrote:
Xyne wrote:
Instead of hosting modified source files, why don't you include the patch with the PKGBUILD instead?
Great idea.
Here it is: http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=40586
First PKGBUILD I wrote from the ground up so if anyone has some objection/comment let's hear it please.
Add more dependencies as said in the compile.txt of ptokax source.
PtokaX need for compiling packages (and url where to find sources when package is not available in your OS):
g++ (name in Debian) | http://gcc.gnu.org/
make (name in Debian) | http://www.gnu.org/software/make/
liblua5.1 + liblua5.1-dev (names in Debian) | http://www.lua.org
zlib1g + zlib1g-dev (names in Debian) | http://zlib.net
TinyXml | http://sourceforge.net/projects/tinyxml

I couldn't find the -dev packages with yaourt; it seems to compile fine though.

I'm not sure if tinyxml should be considered a dependency though since it's only compiled and used within $srcdir. I don't know if the executable needs it afterwards.

shadyabhi · 2010-09-06 17:51:59

Thats because in Arch we have both libraries and development headers in only one package... Thats the reason we have small repository in terms of number of packages than debian based distributions..

Arch Linux

#1 2010-09-06 07:09:36

Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#2 2010-09-06 07:31:31

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#3 2010-09-06 11:49:49

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#4 2010-09-06 11:55:22

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#5 2010-09-06 12:06:13

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#6 2010-09-06 17:00:13

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#7 2010-09-06 17:25:40

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#8 2010-09-06 17:43:30

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

#9 2010-09-06 17:51:59

Re: Please put Ptokax In AUR.

Board footer