You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hi all, I am relatively new to arch linux and this is my first problem with pacman.
Updating to version 3.5.0-1 seems to break pacman for me
$ pacman -Syy
pacman: error while loading shared libraries: liblzma.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I followed the instructions in the sticky post for repairing a broken pacman. I retrieved the 3.4 package from my cache, untarred and used the binary to try to reinstall libarchive, however I now see this error:
$ ./pacman -Sf libarchive
./pacman: error while loading shared libraries: libalpm.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
I have libalpm.so.6
I now see why that post was stickied.
Offline
Ok I got 3.4 fixed!
Just needed to copy libalpm.so.5 from package /lib directory *facepalm*
Now I can do my system update... wait a sec... this doesn't seem right
Remove (9): util-linux-ng-2.18-2 libusb1-1.0.8-1 libjpeg-8.0.2-1
libdjvu-3.5.22-3 libelf-0.8.13-1 pycairo-1.8.8-1 libv4l-0.6.4-1
mailx-8.1.1-7 xorg-res-utils-1.0.3-3
Total Removed Size: 10.65 MB
Targets (417): linux-api-headers-2.6.37-1 tzdata-2011d-1 glibc-2.13-4
.......
.......
.......
Total Download Size: 525.58 MB
Total Installed Size: 2285.73 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
Offline
For your first post it's hard to follow how you got there in the first place, but it sounds kind of like you did a partial update rather than running pacman -Syu, which as you discovered can cause problems. I'd also recommend against running testing until you're more comfortable with Arch. If you got pacman 3.5 by a method other than doing a full upgrade to testing, that also can be a source of things breaking.
As for your second post, what "doesn't seem right" ? That packages are being removed? At least some of those I recognize (and probably all of them) were replaced by other packages - which pacman should have asked you about.
Offline
Is it similar to https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=113335 ?
Offline
Sorry for doubleposting, but if I just edit my previous post, people who subscribed won't be notified.
Offline
Moving to testing...
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
Sorry for posting in the wrong forum :-)
The "what doesn't seem right" would be the 500+ MB download and 2GB install
As for how I got here... I forget now, but I think it was something like
- pacman -Syy
- pacman -Su
- pacman-db-upgrade
Not necessarily in that order.
Offline
Sorry for posting in the wrong forum :-)
The "what doesn't seem right" would be the 500+ MB download and 2GB install
Compression
As for how I got here... I forget now, but I think it was something like
- pacman -Syy
- pacman -Su
- pacman-db-upgradeNot necessarily in that order.
The first pacman -Su probably asked if you want to install pacman first before all the rest, didn't it?
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline
Well the first package I upgraded was pacman... BIG MISTAKE
I guess I needed to upgrade libarchive first maybe?
I don't remember if the update command asked to upgrade pacman or if I did it myself.
Offline
@codeRage you just hit a bug in pacman.
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/23325
i suggest to disable testing, fully upate from the current core/extra/community and then enable testing
Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.
Offline
i suggest to disable testing, fully upate from the current core/extra/community and then enable testing
In fact, I never enable [testing] for my first update after an install. I like to know things work before I try and break them!
Offline
Pages: 1