You are not logged in.
hi all,
if i mark a topic solved im thinking that nobody will comment on it. so if my issue is solved, but i have a couple questions on the end, and would like to discuss it, should i remove the [SOLVED] from it to make sure it happens? or do you find that users still resurrect threads that are solved?
Last edited by wolfdogg (2011-06-04 05:50:55)
Offline
No - please don't "resurrect" solved threads. If the issue is solved - mark it so. If you have separate questions arising from the thread, start a new one.
If, however, you prematurely marked a thread as solved, then it is fine to remove that from the title.
Offline
maybe i mis spoke a bit. im not resurrecting a solved thread, but i think what you saying is dont expect my thread to be used if it is marked solved.
its my thread, and i would like more discussion on it, even though my initial question was solved.
two things, if a user has the same question, as the topic, the user will find the answer by reading down to the 2nd reply. therefore it is solved. but at the end of the 2nd reply, i asked if anyone else can elaborate, to see if anybody else has run into these scenarios yet.
therefore, it is solved, but still open to discussion.
2nd thing, im willing to wait a long time for an answer, years if necessary, therefore the thread will never be solved if the criteria in marking it solved is as bland as you mentioned. :0()
Last edited by wolfdogg (2011-06-03 22:30:56)
Offline
If you are referring to this thread https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=120202 then it should be marked as solved.
You are basically asking a completely different question about building packages from source, which has nothing to do with the error in the thread title. Anyone searching on that same error would find everything after post #4 irrelevant.
Also, your second issue doesn't actually need any discussion - you could just read up on pacman, ABS and AUR...
Offline
lol. actually i was referring to a thread in which i didnt get any help, but i solved it myself. read in the end, my question for comments. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=119754
Offline
Good on you for solving it yourself. That is the Arch Way.
Marking it solved doesn't preclude anyone else contributing. Someone may stumble along and answer your questions...
Arch Linux users have a tendency to solve problems themselves and share the results with the community and development team – a "do first, then ask" philosophy
Offline
Good on you for solving it yourself. That is the Arch Way.
Marking it solved doesn't preclude anyone else contributing. Someone may stumble along and answer your questions...
Arch Way wrote:Arch Linux users have a tendency to solve problems themselves and share the results with the community and development team – a "do first, then ask" philosophy
And even threads marked [solved] turn up in searches or the like. Unlike other forums (which have built-in filters/searches for 'non-solved' threads), Arch's forums don't depend so much on the tag since its manually added.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline