You are not logged in.

#1 2011-06-14 12:04:05

ghen
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2010-08-31
Posts: 121

new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

Hi,

with the old (ifconfig-based) initscripts, I had static IPv4+IPv6 addresses (on a single interface) work like this:

eth0="eth0 178.21.112.59 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 178.21.112.255 add 2a02:2308::3be:0:1/64"
INTERFACES=(eth0)

gateway="default gw 178.21.112.1"
gateway6="default gw 2a02:2308::1"
ROUTES=(gateway gateway6)

The new initscripts (iproute2-based) don't support this anymore, and refer to netcfg for anything more "complex" than a single interface with a single (IPv4) address.  However netcfg doesn't seem to (properly) support IPv6.  So this is actually a regression, and I've left my old rc.conf in place for now.

I think it's a shame IPv6 is treated like a second-class citizen in 2011.

How are other IPv6'ers configuring their networks now?

Offline

#2 2011-06-14 12:07:47

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

netcfg from testing supports ipv6


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#3 2011-06-14 14:11:31

ghen
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2010-08-31
Posts: 121

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

I don't see a netcfg package in testing?

Offline

#4 2011-06-14 14:25:55

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

ghen wrote:

Hi,

with the old (ifconfig-based) initscripts, I had static IPv4+IPv6 addresses (on a single interface) work like this:

eth0="eth0 178.21.112.59 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 178.21.112.255 add 2a02:2308::3be:0:1/64"
INTERFACES=(eth0)

gateway="default gw 178.21.112.1"
gateway6="default gw 2a02:2308::1"
ROUTES=(gateway gateway6)

The new initscripts (iproute2-based) don't support this anymore, and refer to netcfg for anything more "complex" than a single interface with a single (IPv4) address.  However netcfg doesn't seem to (properly) support IPv6.  So this is actually a regression, and I've left my old rc.conf in place for now.

I think it's a shame IPv6 is treated like a second-class citizen in 2011.

How are other IPv6'ers configuring their networks now?

OT: Where do you get native ipv6 in Belgium? Are you in some pilot program?

Offline

#5 2011-06-14 14:43:15

ghen
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2010-08-31
Posts: 121

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

This config is from a hosted server in the Netherlands.
At home in Belgium, I have tunneled IPv6 via SixXS.
For native: yes, I'm in some pilot program. ;-)

Offline

#6 2011-06-14 14:45:11

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#7 2011-06-14 14:58:12

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

ghen wrote:

This config is from a hosted server in the Netherlands.
At home in Belgium, I have tunneled IPv6 via SixXS.
For native: yes, I'm in some pilot program. ;-)

A pilot in the netherlands then? Indeed, I knew they've got ISPs that offer ipv6 there.
I'm also using sixxs atm, that works decently but unfortunately the speeds are often quite a bit less than what I get over ipv4.

Offline

#8 2011-06-14 22:19:48

ghen
Member
From: Belgium
Registered: 2010-08-31
Posts: 121

Re: new initscripts and IPv6/dualstack support?

wonder wrote:

sorry, is about to release big_smile

Thanks, I'll give it a try when it's there.  It looks good at first sight.

I still regret it won't be possible via rc.conf like the IPv4 case though...

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB