You are not logged in.
Only difference I see is one have gui other does not.
Offline
There are differences, which, I do not know. Xcompmgr works fine here while cairo compmgr has some bugs.
Vanity of vanities, saith the Preacher, vanity of vanities; all is vanity.
What profit hath a man of all his labour which he taketh under the sun?
All the rivers run into the sea; yet the sea is not full; unto the place from whence the rivers come, thither they return again.
For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
Offline
One can use 3D acceleration of your GPU, the other cannot :-)
Offline
Different codebase, different bugs, both kind of sucks.
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
One can use 3D acceleration of your GPU, the other cannot :-)
Or you can understand this way: One requires you having a GPU with 3D acceleration (Holy crap Is there any one without 3D acceleration capability nowadays? Unfortunately Yes, some AMD 6800 series for example) , and One doesn't.
Offline
Different codebase, different bugs, both kind of sucks.
QFT
Offline
Different codebase, different bugs, both kind of sucks.
Which sucks less?
Offline
Mr.Elendig wrote:Different codebase, different bugs, both kind of sucks.
Which sucks less?
The one that works better on your machine.
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
One can use 3D acceleration of your GPU, the other cannot :-)
which one can use GPU 3D?
Offline
diff these two:
- http://cairo-compmgr.tuxfamily.org/
- https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xcompmgr
Offline
One can use 3D acceleration of your GPU, the other cannot :-)
Actually, both can. Do you think xrender acceleration is not happening on the 3d engine of your GPU? Do you think your graphic card even still has a 2d engine?
@Kjonat: xcompmgr uses xrender, cairo-compmgr can use either xrender or opengl. Though last time I tried, cairo-compmgr was buggy as hell, to the point of being unusable. And if you go the xcompmgr route, I'd actually advise to go with dcompmgr from AUR. It's a fork by one of the openbox developers, it has a few additional features and bugfixes.
Last edited by Gusar (2011-07-14 20:31:14)
Offline