You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
So I just installed arch on a machine I acquired from a friend. When I first got it (a few weeks ago), I booted into Windows 98 (was already on it) just to make sure that it would start up and everything.
I installed Arch earlier today. When I rebooted I received this:
Searching for boot record on CD-ROM: Failed
Searching for boot record on Floppy Disk: Failed
Searching for boot record on IDE-0: OK
and then it just hangs.
I thought I had installed grub from the arch cd. Quick question: on down the list on the installer, it says install bootloader. So when I went to that, I chose grub, okay (or done whatever it says), but it didn't seem like it did anything. Maybe I'm mistaken. Do I need to install grub in a different fashion?
EDIT: Does it sound like I have to revive the MBR?
Offline
if you didn't "touch" the grub config file, grub doenst install sometimes. What i do is when in the config phase of the install, I open every one of the config files, and do a write-quit in vi, so as to save the file. I have never had a problem once I have done that.
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
if you didn't "touch" the grub config file, grub doenst install sometimes. What i do is when in the config phase of the install, I open every one of the config files, and do a write-quit in vi, so as to save the file. I have never had a problem once I have done that.
I'm pretty sure I saved the menu.lst a few times in the arch setup before I installed grub with vi ('ZZ'). Does it matter if I do this before/after installing grub?
Offline
has to be before. if that is the case, then I don't know what the issue is. Another question...
Is your /boot directory set as..bootable?
"Be conservative in what you send; be liberal in what you accept." -- Postel's Law
"tacos" -- Cactus' Law
"t̥͍͎̪̪͗a̴̻̩͈͚ͨc̠o̩̙͈ͫͅs͙͎̙͊ ͔͇̫̜t͎̳̀a̜̞̗ͩc̗͍͚o̲̯̿s̖̣̤̙͌ ̖̜̈ț̰̫͓ạ̪͖̳c̲͎͕̰̯̃̈o͉ͅs̪ͪ ̜̻̖̜͕" -- -̖͚̫̙̓-̺̠͇ͤ̃ ̜̪̜ͯZ͔̗̭̞ͪA̝͈̙͖̩L͉̠̺͓G̙̞̦͖O̳̗͍
Offline
has to be before. if that is the case, then I don't know what the issue is. Another question...
Is your /boot directory set as..bootable?
Doesnt need to be, only windows needs the bootable flag.
Offline
has to be before. if that is the case, then I don't know what the issue is. Another question...
Is your /boot directory set as..bootable?
Yes, I have.
EDIT: I will try again tomorrow, and post some more information if I can get any.
Offline
Just boot archie, mount your arch install, mount --bind /sys, /proc, and /dev into your arch install's mount, then chroot in, then grub-install /dev/hda, assuming you have your bootloader on HDA.
iphitus
Offline
I sort of solved it, I ended up installing a base ubuntu system (to make sure i didn't kill the mbr), and now grub starts. When i get home tonight, i will kill ubuntu and do arch. For some reason the arch installation always gives me problems with grub.
Offline
Every grub-based distro I ever used gave me grief.
Why do you use LiLo, they ask? ;-)
Dusty
Offline
I can't do lilo, its too complex for my little mind.
Offline
if you didn't "touch" the grub config file, grub doenst install sometimes. What i do is when in the config phase of the install, I open every one of the config files, and do a write-quit in vi, so as to save the file. I have never had a problem once I have done that.
I'm pretty sure it forces you to edit menu.lst before you can 'install bootloader'
"Ignorance is bliss, for stupid people."
"open-source is [...] programming Darwinism."
Vaughan-Nichols
Offline
Pages: 1