You are not logged in.
Hi Archers,
Today, when I was reading systemd man, and I saw the following pages: systemd.mount & systemd.automount. It says we can create "native" systemd units instead of fstab (we still have fstab support).
I asked me one question: In the future, will fstab disappear?
Actually, I found messages on the Fedora mailing list about it. But it was one year ago and just about Fedora.
Could you tell me what Archlinux developers think?
It's just a question without any trolls.
Thank you.
Offline
I don't think the devs will force a change like that on th community.
CPU-optimized Linux-ck packages @ Repo-ck • AUR packages • Zsh and other configs
Offline
I can't speak for the devs here, but imho this would be pointless since fstab is far simpler than writing mount units - afaik even upstream recommends using fstab instead of writing your own mount units.
Offline
I saw something from Lennart Poeterring (which I can't find anymore, but I thinkn it was from a mailing list) that says that there is no plan to replace fstab. The generator works fine, and fstab is something that should stay for compatibility reasons.
Offline
Until systemd suport fstab and until systemd devs recommend fstab (indiferent is for compatibility or not) and until other distros not remove fstab
I sure that Arch not goin anyting
but if distros drop ot arch dev probably begin to quostionate it and
but if systemd drop fstab support, you are sure that arch dev think seriously in what make ( and watching the last year changes I sure that they want drop it)
Well, I suppose that this is somekind of signature, no?
Offline
fstab file is really simple and still powerful. Units seem to be more complicated even if they add new features (and apparently you need a unit file for every mount). That's why I was a bit worried.
I'm sure Arch devs won't drop it suddenly. It's rather related to systemd devs.
That's why I asked it
Offline
I am sure they wont drop it. In the man page it is only stated that you are capable of doing it.
Quote (man systemd.mount):
Mount units may either be configured via unit files, or via /etc/fstab (see fstab(5) for details). Mounts listed in /etc/fstab will be converted into native units dynamically at boot and when the configuration of the system manager is reloaded. See systemd-fstab-generator(8) for details about the conversion.
I think you were talking about that particular notice?
I think it just means that you can do it if you want to, the units just take precedence over /etc/fstab.
On the other hand, we have now two things that can handle the same thing. So it would make sense to remove the older one because it is unnecessary.
However I have never written a [Unit] before. Let alone configuring a boot unit ? I guess I wouldn't be very happy if they migrated to pure systemd, even though i like the though of a "pure" systemd configuration.
Last edited by ytech (2012-11-18 22:34:47)
Don't do this -> /bin/bash shred -fun 42 `ls`
--------------------------------------
.:Blog:.:github:.:Livejournal:.:Pastebin:.
Offline
Systemd generates unit files for stuff it mounts (when reading fstab). I think you can copy those.
aur S & M :: forum rules :: Community Ethos
Resources for Women, POC, LGBT*, and allies
Offline
It will come with "features" like binary logs.
Linux odin 3.13.1-pf #1 SMP PREEMPT Wed Mar 5 21:47:28 CET 2014 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Offline
It will come with "features" like binary logs.
Stop being a troll. If you have nothing constructive to add, just don't post.
Allan-Volunteer on the (topic being discussed) mailn lists. You never get the people who matters attention on the forums.
jasonwryan-Installing Arch is a measure of your literacy. Maintaining Arch is a measure of your diligence. Contributing to Arch is a measure of your competence.
Griemak-Bleeding edge, not bleeding flat. Edge denotes falls will occur from time to time. Bring your own parachute.
Offline