You are not logged in.
systemD is much more than the rc scripts. Are you gonna be replacing the other parts as well or your only issue is with systemD's service files?
It is not systemD (nor Systemd), but systemd. On high holidays you may also spell it sÿstëmd.
Last edited by cedricmc (2012-11-23 11:27:23)
Offline
i've looked a bit into replacing systemd, and it seems to me there are 3 things that could/need to be replaced :
- the init system
- udev
- logind
there are several alternative init systems around, and also udev has been forked a few times.
replacing logind could be done by compiling polkit with specifc ./configure options to use alternative methods for authenticating.
consolekit is one of those alternatives, unix groups are another.
In short, archlinux without systemd seems doable.
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
- udev
Nope. Where did you get this impression?
Offline
89c51 wrote:Yes bad example. I was looking at logrotate and cronie which don't seem -to ignorant me at least- to be needed. At least nothing requires them on my system.
Many package require a cron daemon, and systemd does not offer the full functionality of cron. The same with logrotate: I still have log files in /var/log/ (for example, from apache) that need rotation. I guess neither of those packages is going away.
Thanks for the answer. I believe systemd will gain full crone functionality at some point and some packages will probably be made to work better with the journal log.
Offline
i've looked a bit into replacing systemd, and it seems to me there are 3 things that could/need to be replaced :
- the init system
- udev
- logindthere are several alternative init systems around, and also udev has been forked a few times.
replacing logind could be done by compiling polkit with specifc ./configure options to use alternative methods for authenticating.
consolekit is one of those alternatives, unix groups are another.In short, archlinux without systemd seems doable.
cd systemd
./configure --stuff --and --flags --as --needed
make udevd
echo '!next'
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
I just read (in the forums) that there are some good experiences from users running openrc with archlinux, so yes it is possible.
Offline
dolby wrote:systemD is much more than the rc scripts. Are you gonna be replacing the other parts as well or your only issue is with systemD's service files?
It is not systemD (nor Systemd), but systemd. On high holidays you may also spell it sÿstëmd.
Socking news. That changes everything.
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
is there arch without systemd?
i want less distro without complexity..
http://boycottsystemd.org/
Using Udev Without Systemd Is Going To Become Harder
Last edited by mmix (2014-07-13 21:59:17)
Offline
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=152606 for starters.
Offline
is there arch without systemd?
i want less distro without complexity..
http://boycottsystemd.org/
Get a blog for the links, leave dead threads alone, and accept that Arch is a systemd distribution and practically all other distributions will be (or already are) too.
Offline
Closing...
Offline