You are not logged in.
Doing an update on AUR with yaourt (-Syu --aur) renders this:
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/lib/kde4/pateplugin.so'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/close_tag.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/console/config.ui'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/console/console.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/config.ui'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/gid.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/idutils.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/tool.ui'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/plugins/pate/kate/__init__.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/plugins/pate/kate/gui.py'
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/kde4/services/pate.desktop'I.e., the operation ends with these lines, whatever causes it.
Anyone seen something similar?
Last edited by whaler (2013-04-12 22:58:55)
Offline
Does pacman -Syu return the same?
Offline
Doing an update on AUR with yaourt (-Syu --aur) renders this:
file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/lib/kde4/pateplugin.so' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/close_tag.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/console/config.ui' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/console/console.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/config.ui' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/gid.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/idutils.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/pate/gid/tool.ui' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/plugins/pate/kate/__init__.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/apps/kate/plugins/pate/kate/gui.py' file owned by 'kdesdk-kate' and 'pate-git': 'usr/share/kde4/services/pate.desktop'I.e., the operation ends with these lines, whatever causes it.
Anyone seen something similar?
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
This is what you do in such situations:
1. Try updating only with pacman.
2. See if AUR packages are involved.
3. Remove and manually rebuild the aur packages in question.
4. Update with pacman.
5. Re-install AUR packages.
Offline
Moving to AUR Issues
Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of nature -- Michael Faraday
The shortest way to ruin a country is to give power to demagogues.— Dionysius of Halicarnassus
---
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way
Offline
Yes I had a similar issue with wxgtk2.9 and wxgtk-2.9. Just remove one of the packages. My guess is pate-git since it's not in the aur/repos.
Offline
Thanks for the responses!
@hadrons123: No, 'pacman -Syu' seems to be working normally.
@Awebb: My routine is to first update with pacman and then go to user-space and issue 'yaourt -Syu --aur'. This may be a bit redundant, but I am not familiar with a command for updating (all) AUR packages without the -Syu parameters.
@WorMzy and @dodo3773: You seem to point at the same solution. I will have a closer look at possible package conflicts and report back.
---
Edit:
Yes, apparently it was 'pate-git'. Removing it also removed the conflict warnings.
Funny, though, since it stems from Kate's developers and had been sitting there since last october without any fuss. The package is no longer to be found either in official repos or in AUR, if it ever was, as a separate package. Also strange that it, presumably an - or part of an - official package, was conflicting with another official package, namely 'kdesdk-kate'. But what do I know... :-)
Thanks again!
Last edited by whaler (2013-04-12 22:40:18)
Offline
whaler,
In order to properly trouble-shoot this, it may be useful to see if you've attempted to recompile your AUR installs manually, via makepkg et al. Never rely on AUR/pacman orientated wrappers to do the work for you. As good as some may appear to be, the best way is to see behind the scene.
Offline
whaler,
In order to properly trouble-shoot this, it may be useful to see if you've attempted to recompile your AUR installs manually, via makepkg et al. Never rely on AUR/pacman orientated wrappers to do the work for you. As good as some may appear to be, the best way is to see behind the scene.
Good advice.
I have been running Arch without reinstalling, and relied on Yaourt, for five years now without any major problems.
One day, however, I am sure I will find the time to learn and use makepkg and friends, including ABS...
Offline
I have been running Arch without reinstalling, and relied on Yaourt, for five years now... One day, however, I am sure I will find the time to learn and use makepkg and friends, including ABS...
FluxBB needs to add some [irony] tags. whaler, I'd suggest reading over this.
Last edited by ANOKNUSA (2013-04-13 15:05:20)
Offline
whaler wrote:I have been running Arch without reinstalling, and relied on Yaourt, for five years now... One day, however, I am sure I will find the time to learn and use makepkg and friends, including ABS...
FluxBB needs to add some [irony] tags. whaler, I'd suggest reading over this.
And I assumed that he(whaler) was actually joking.
Last edited by hadrons123 (2013-04-13 16:44:06)
Offline
@ANOKNUSA and @hadrons123: Okay, my last post was a _little bit tongue in cheek, but I really should try to get my head around makepkg and perhaps use it. On the other hand, a day has only so many hours. Or at least here, it seems to...
As for those who speak about responsibility, that's a non-issue, IMO, given that nobody but the user suffers negligent administration. Besides, without the pleas for help, how would we build Arch's helpful fora? ![]()
Offline
Better read this first. http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Arch Linux fora has a reputation for better quality among the linux distros.
Offline