You are not logged in.
After a long battle to install Arch along side OSX on my Macbook Air, I'm ready to set up Gnome but I wanted to know -because I read it is a work in progress- if Wayland is the way to go or should I just go with Xorg?
Thanks!
Offline
GNOME Shell Wayland session 3.14 doesn't even start over here on Arch. So not recommended by me.
Offline
GNOME Shell Wayland session 3.14 doesn't even start over here on Arch. So not recommended by me.
This, along with the point that most of the other major DEs's are at different stages of working out support for Wayland (from not at all to it might work) would probably signal that X is probably the choice if you want a GUI to run.
Claire is fine.
Problems? I have dysgraphia, so clear and concise please.
My public GPG key for package signing
My x86_64 package repository
Offline
My GNOME Wayland session starts and runs fine and the compositing (especially in respect of screen tearing) is the best I have ever used.
Unfortunately, the synaptics driver fails under Wayland (a known issue), so I can't use it on my laptop ![]()
EDIT: Intel HD4600
Last edited by Head_on_a_Stick (2014-12-29 20:25:26)
Jin, Jîyan, Azadî
Offline
GNOME Shell Wayland session 3.14 doesn't even start over here on Arch. So not recommended by me.
Did you try to install xorg-server-xwayland? I tried wayland desktop several times and as of today it is almost usable (except Synaptics driver won't load).
My GNOME Wayland session starts and runs fine and the compositing (especially in respect of screen tearing) is the best I have ever used.
Unfortunately, the synaptics driver fails under Wayland (a known issue), so I can't use it on my laptop sad
EDIT: Intel HD4600
Ok, tried to find more about this topic, but failed could you tell me where to get updates to this issue?
Offline
Ok, tried to find more about this topic, but failed could you tell me where to get updates to this issue?
Unfortunately not -- my comment was based on a statement made by another user in a thread some months ago.
I didn't even try to research it further because the non-wayland GNOME compositor works almost as well anyway and better than the kwin equivalent or compton.
Jin, Jîyan, Azadî
Offline
I prefer a tiling wm, so wayland doesn't work for me yet.
Unfortunately, the synaptics driver fails under Wayland (a known issue), so I can't use it on my laptop
Even if it works, it feels unpolished. I also don't like the settings for my touchpad, but libinput doesn't allow me to change them. When the rest works, I'll have to patch libinput I guess.
| alias CUTF='LANG=en_XX.UTF-8@POSIX ' | alias ENGLISH='LANG=C.UTF-8 ' |
Offline
I think the only Linux distributions that currently officially support Wayland are:
RebeccaBlackOS
SailfishOS
Offline
I think the only Linux distributions that currently officially support Wayland are:
RebeccaBlackOS
Which is a test thing AFAIK
SailfishOS
Which is a mobile OS.
So the answer is NO. DEs need a lot of work to get things at Xorg level. And then there are apps.
Offline
I prefer a tiling wm, so wayland doesn't work for me yet.
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:Unfortunately, the synaptics driver fails under Wayland (a known issue), so I can't use it on my laptop
Even if it works, it feels unpolished. I also don't like the settings for my touchpad, but libinput doesn't allow me to change them. When the rest works, I'll have to patch libinput I guess.
There are tiling wayland compositors. They're all listed in the wiki.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5thcLnLHkjs
I don't have any issues with Gnome on Wayland appart from minor input issues.
Won't start with prop. drivers or if you don't have xorg-server-xwayland installed.
Last edited by blackout23 (2015-01-09 21:26:03)
Offline
Evil #archlinux@libera.chat channel op and general support dude.
. files on github, Screenshots, Random pics and the rest
Offline
Gnome on Wayland works just fine on my Haswell laptop. Some small bugs remain but it I have been running it succesfully for a couple of months now.
Offline