You are not logged in.
Dear fellas,
I wonder if there is any workaround to upgrade to the latest 4.15-1 kernel using the current nvidia-340xx..
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: nvidia-340xx: installing linux (4.15-1) breaks dependency 'linux<4.15'
While I was flagging nvidia-340xx as outdated, I learned that the package is "Orphan" regarding maintainers.
Any clue on this matter is appreciated.
Thanks
Offline
Mod note: moved to [testing] Repo Forum.
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
See this thread on the mailing list: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/a … 29127.html
| alias CUTF='LANG=en_XX.UTF-8@POSIX ' |
Offline
See this thread on the mailing list: https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/a … 29127.html
Thanks for sharing this info..
Do you have any clue if Giancarlo Razzolini adopted the nvidia-340xx package or not?
Offline
Does Nouveau could be an option to Nvidia-340xx?
Offline
You can check yourself: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extr … dia-340xx/
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
You can check yourself: https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extr … dia-340xx/
Sorry, I missed the point. To check myself regarding Nouveau on https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extr … dia-340xx/?
Offline
That was a reply to your query regarding the 340xx package ownership. Your nouveau question makes no sense. You either use nouveau, or you use nvidia's driver -- you can't use both.
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Offline
That was a reply to your query regarding the 340xx package ownership. Your nouveau question makes no sense. You either use nouveau, or you use nvidia's driver -- you can't use both.
I didn't say to use both together, I don't know where did you read this. Anyway, let me make myself clear this time.. I was asking people for sharing their experiences on the subject of dropping nvidia and got started to use nouveau.
Offline
If you are asking if nouveau supports the same cards as nvidia-340xx and can be used as an alternative, then have a look here and here. Click the chipset name in the column header to get a list of cards with that chipset.
My Arch Linux Stuff • Forum Etiquette • Community Ethos - Arch is not for everyone
Offline
I was asking people for sharing their experiences on the subject of dropping nvidia and got started to use nouveau.
Install it yourself and see. No-one else can hold your hand for this.
Offline
If you have an 800 series or higher then 3D performance with nouveau will be about 5-10% of what you get with the nvidia driver - if you're lucky.
Offline
If you have an 800 series or higher then 3D performance with nouveau will be about 5-10% of what you get with the nvidia driver - if you're lucky.
Thanks for your kind reply and feedback. Appreciated.
Offline
Or update the nvidia-340xx package locally
diff --git a/trunk/PKGBUILD b/trunk/PKGBUILD
index 8fc9e8c..8233451 100644
--- a/trunk/PKGBUILD
+++ b/trunk/PKGBUILD
@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
pkgbase=nvidia-340xx
pkgname=(nvidia-340xx nvidia-340xx-dkms)
pkgver=340.106
-_extramodules=extramodules-4.14-ARCH
-pkgrel=3
+_extramodules=extramodules-4.15-ARCH
+pkgrel=4
pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for linux, 340xx legacy branch"
arch=('x86_64')
url="http://www.nvidia.com/"
-makedepends=("nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}" 'linux' 'linux-headers>=4.14' 'linux-headers<4.15')
+makedepends=("nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}" 'linux' 'linux-headers>=4.15' 'linux-headers<4.16')
conflicts=('nvidia')
license=('custom')
options=('!strip')
Offline
Or update the nvidia-340xx package locally
diff --git a/trunk/PKGBUILD b/trunk/PKGBUILD index 8fc9e8c..8233451 100644 --- a/trunk/PKGBUILD +++ b/trunk/PKGBUILD @@ -5,12 +5,12 @@ pkgbase=nvidia-340xx pkgname=(nvidia-340xx nvidia-340xx-dkms) pkgver=340.106 -_extramodules=extramodules-4.14-ARCH -pkgrel=3 +_extramodules=extramodules-4.15-ARCH +pkgrel=4 pkgdesc="NVIDIA drivers for linux, 340xx legacy branch" arch=('x86_64') url="http://www.nvidia.com/" -makedepends=("nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}" 'linux' 'linux-headers>=4.14' 'linux-headers<4.15') +makedepends=("nvidia-340xx-utils=${pkgver}" 'linux' 'linux-headers>=4.15' 'linux-headers<4.16') conflicts=('nvidia') license=('custom') options=('!strip')
It's getting still better! Thanks for the insight
PS. May I drop you a PM (email)?
Last edited by erickwill (2018-02-01 00:52:43)
Offline
@loqs: That is most likely not enough, the mailing list thread mentions a new patch is needed as well, maybe this:
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topi … 9/#5229739
| alias CUTF='LANG=en_XX.UTF-8@POSIX ' |
Offline
@loqs: That is most likely not enough, the mailing list thread mentions a new patch is needed as well, maybe this:
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topi … 9/#5229739
It's so exciting to see the solution coming up right in front of my screen! Thanks fella for your collaboration.
Offline
May I ask why you need the 4.15 kernel? I am always curious when people want to use a kernel that causes other problems.
Offline
May I ask why you need the 4.15 kernel? I am always curious when people want to use a kernel that causes other problems.
Well, I think that the bleeding cutting edge is, ALSO, one of the faces of Arch Linux.. so makes sense that as an Arch Linux user, I wish to be at the edge as to the others
Offline
@progandy It gained 4.15 compatibility with the update from 104 to 106 it still needs the 4.11 patch as the conftests are not executed fortunately the timer test defaults to being 4.15 compatible.
Edit:
makepkg output too many warnings to post in code but it does build successfully.
Last edited by loqs (2018-02-01 01:28:08)
Offline