You are not logged in.

#1 2006-08-02 00:47:42

Phrodo_00
Member
From: Santiago de Chile
Registered: 2006-04-09
Posts: 340
Website

gtk 2.10... why?

I have a doubt... do anyone know why did arch switch to gtk 2.10 when not even gtk-engines-cvs compiles against it (requires 2.8 it seems).... it's not like the old engines don't work (a link solves it for now). Also, when will engines build against it?

Offline

#2 2006-08-02 00:58:37

user
Member
Registered: 2006-03-29
Posts: 465

Re: gtk 2.10... why?


I removed my sig, cause i select the flag, the flag often the target of enemy.

SAR brain-tumor
[img]http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/460/cellphonethumb0ff.jpg[/img]

Offline

#3 2006-08-02 01:43:51

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: gtk 2.10... why?

The engines seem to work fine with it.

Offline

#4 2006-08-02 01:50:27

Phrodo_00
Member
From: Santiago de Chile
Registered: 2006-04-09
Posts: 340
Website

Re: gtk 2.10... why?

Gullible Jones wrote:

The engines seem to work fine with it.

I don't know, in my machine it looks the engines only in /usr/lib/gtk2.0/2.10.0/engines, not the ones in /usr/lib/gtk2.0/2.4.0/engines. And gtk-engines-cvs (from aur) complains about not finding gtk 2.8 while doing the make...

Offline

#5 2006-08-02 02:36:15

Gullible Jones
Member
Registered: 2004-12-29
Posts: 4,863

Re: gtk 2.10... why?

The directory thing is an internal change, the new gtk-engines package handles it. The CVS problem I'm not sure about though...

Offline

#6 2006-08-02 15:53:44

johnisevil
Member
From: Hamilton, ON Canada
Registered: 2003-08-07
Posts: 221
Website

Re: gtk 2.10... why?

2.10 works perfectly for me.  All I really needed to do was recompile a few packages.  Those being my packages for the rezlooks engine, murrine engine and gtk-engines (I use the unstable version) and all work well.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB