You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2006-08-02 00:47:42
- Phrodo_00
- Member
- From: Seattle, WA
- Registered: 2006-04-09
- Posts: 342
- Website
gtk 2.10... why?
I have a doubt... do anyone know why did arch switch to gtk 2.10 when not even gtk-engines-cvs compiles against it (requires 2.8 it seems).... it's not like the old engines don't work (a link solves it for now). Also, when will engines build against it?
Offline
#2 2006-08-02 00:58:37
- user
- Member
- Registered: 2006-03-29
- Posts: 465
Re: gtk 2.10... why?
I removed my sig, cause i select the flag, the flag often the target of enemy.
SAR brain-tumor
[img]http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/460/cellphonethumb0ff.jpg[/img]
Offline
#3 2006-08-02 01:43:51
- Gullible Jones
- Member
- Registered: 2004-12-29
- Posts: 4,863
Re: gtk 2.10... why?
The engines seem to work fine with it.
Offline
#4 2006-08-02 01:50:27
- Phrodo_00
- Member
- From: Seattle, WA
- Registered: 2006-04-09
- Posts: 342
- Website
Re: gtk 2.10... why?
The engines seem to work fine with it.
I don't know, in my machine it looks the engines only in /usr/lib/gtk2.0/2.10.0/engines, not the ones in /usr/lib/gtk2.0/2.4.0/engines. And gtk-engines-cvs (from aur) complains about not finding gtk 2.8 while doing the make...
Offline
#5 2006-08-02 02:36:15
- Gullible Jones
- Member
- Registered: 2004-12-29
- Posts: 4,863
Re: gtk 2.10... why?
The directory thing is an internal change, the new gtk-engines package handles it. The CVS problem I'm not sure about though...
Offline
#6 2006-08-02 15:53:44
- johnisevil
- Member
- From: Hamilton, ON Canada
- Registered: 2003-08-07
- Posts: 221
- Website
Re: gtk 2.10... why?
2.10 works perfectly for me. All I really needed to do was recompile a few packages. Those being my packages for the rezlooks engine, murrine engine and gtk-engines (I use the unstable version) and all work well.
Offline
Pages: 1