You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Ok. I've just upgraded to 2.6.18. I've seen a few times to upgrade my fstab paths; however, I've failed to find any information on it.
Could somebody explain to me exactly what is to be done? Thanks. ![]()
My current fstab:
#
# /etc/fstab: static file system information
#
# <file> <dir> <type> <options> <dump> <pass>
none /dev/pts devpts defaults 0 0
none /dev/shm tmpfs defaults 0 0
/dev/hdd /mnt/cd iso9660 ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
/dev/dvd /mnt/dvd udf ro,user,noauto,unhide 0 0
#/dev/fd0 /mnt/fl vfat user,noauto 0 0
/dev/hdb3 / ext3 defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb1 /boot ext2 defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0
/dev/hda1 /mnt/hd/ubuntu ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/hdc1 /mnt/hd/backup_and_music ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/sda1 /mnt/usb/usbdisk vfat noauto,user,umask=000 0 0Intel i7-920 (stock), ASUS P6TD-Deluxe, AMD R9 270X, RAM: 6GB
Offline
Your fstab is fine. I'm pretty sure the path mention was old, having to do with devfs pathing (/dev/discs/disc0/part2 == /dev/hda2)
Offline
Cheers. So for all the time I've used linux this has always been the new way.
It confused me when it said it was deprecated in favour of the old style.
![]()
Intel i7-920 (stock), ASUS P6TD-Deluxe, AMD R9 270X, RAM: 6GB
Offline
why all those .pacnew files with todays updates?
most of them are useless right?
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
why all those .pacnew files with todays updates?
most of them are useless right?
Don't assume that - you should compare the files to what you have to check for any changes.
Offline
i already did that but only change i found was /etc/gshadow has
network:!::while /etc/gshadow.pacnew has
network:x::whats the difference?
There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums. That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)
Offline
Pages: 1