You are not logged in.

#1 2006-09-27 18:23:52

archuser
Member
From: Northamptonshire, UK
Registered: 2006-09-10
Posts: 122

New fstab paths question.

Ok. I've just upgraded to 2.6.18. I've seen a few times to upgrade my fstab paths; however, I've failed to find any information on it.

Could somebody explain to me exactly what is to be done? Thanks. smile

My current fstab:

# 
# /etc/fstab: static file system information
#
# <file>        <dir>         <type>    <options>          <dump> <pass>
none            /dev/pts      devpts    defaults            0      0
none            /dev/shm      tmpfs     defaults            0      0

/dev/hdd        /mnt/cd   iso9660   ro,user,noauto,unhide   0      0
/dev/dvd        /mnt/dvd  udf       ro,user,noauto,unhide   0      0
#/dev/fd0       /mnt/fl   vfat      user,noauto             0      0

/dev/hdb3 / ext3 defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb1 /boot ext2 defaults 0 1
/dev/hdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0

/dev/hda1 /mnt/hd/ubuntu ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/hdc1 /mnt/hd/backup_and_music ext3 defaults 0 0
/dev/sda1 /mnt/usb/usbdisk vfat noauto,user,umask=000 0 0

Intel i7-920 (stock), ASUS P6TD-Deluxe, AMD R9 270X, RAM: 6GB

Offline

#2 2006-09-27 19:00:45

phrakture
Arch Overlord
From: behind you
Registered: 2003-10-29
Posts: 7,879
Website

Re: New fstab paths question.

Your fstab is fine.  I'm pretty sure the path mention was old, having to do with devfs pathing (/dev/discs/disc0/part2 == /dev/hda2)

Offline

#3 2006-09-27 19:30:21

archuser
Member
From: Northamptonshire, UK
Registered: 2006-09-10
Posts: 122

Re: New fstab paths question.

Cheers. So for all the time I've used linux this has always been the new way.

It confused me when it said it was deprecated in favour of the old style.

smile


Intel i7-920 (stock), ASUS P6TD-Deluxe, AMD R9 270X, RAM: 6GB

Offline

#4 2006-09-27 19:38:32

dolby
Member
From: 1992
Registered: 2006-08-08
Posts: 1,581

Re: New fstab paths question.

why all those .pacnew files with todays updates?
most of them are useless right?


There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums.  That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)

Offline

#5 2006-09-27 22:35:11

phrakture
Arch Overlord
From: behind you
Registered: 2003-10-29
Posts: 7,879
Website

Re: New fstab paths question.

dolby wrote:

why all those .pacnew files with todays updates?
most of them are useless right?

Don't assume that - you should compare the files to what you have to check for any changes.

Offline

#6 2006-09-28 01:07:45

dolby
Member
From: 1992
Registered: 2006-08-08
Posts: 1,581

Re: New fstab paths question.

i already did that but only change i found was /etc/gshadow has

network:!::

while /etc/gshadow.pacnew has

network:x::

whats the difference?


There shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than emacs or vi -- mg (1)
[You learn that sarcasm does not often work well in international forums.  That is why we avoid it. -- ewaller (arch linux forum moderator)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB