You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Hello,
While reading the Wiki, I noticed that the Firefox article states that Firefox needs pulseaudio installed for audio playback.
Here's the part in question in the "Multimedia playback" section:
"Firefox uses PulseAudio for audio playback and capture. For sound to work, you need to install the pulseaudio package."
I use Firefox but don't have pulseaudio installed on my system and audio through Firefox works just fine, I have libpulse installed though.
I have mentioned it in the Discussion tab on the article but didn't go further than that. I am not competent enough to change the Wiki, that's why I'm posting here.
I know pulseaudio is not necessary for Firefox audio playback, is it that it just needs libpulse?
Last edited by raphaelabb (2021-03-27 19:43:04)
Offline
The package is compiled with --enable-alsa: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-p … GBUILD#L86
But I am also not competent enough to be sure that this means Pulseaudio (or apulse) is not needed. I use GNOME (and hence PA, or Pipewire) and I'm not stripping it out just to check.
Para todos todo, para nosotros nada
Offline
Hey
I believe libpulse [1] and PulseAudio [2] are different things. Without PulseAudio installed (an optional dependency of Firefox), YouTube and Google Meet will have audio for some reason, but if you try to play a Web game or participate on a videoconference on 8x8, there won't be audio. Don't ask me why tho haha.
[1] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/libpulse/
[2] https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/pulseaudio/
Edit: so sound on games are working without PulseAudio? That's nice. I couldn't test 8x8 tho
Last edited by porcelain1 (2021-03-26 02:57:34)
Behemoth, wake up!
Offline
I have mentioned it in the Discussion tab on the article but didn't go further than that. I am not competent enough to change the Wiki, that's why I'm posting here.
I don't get this argument. How does posting the same question in a different place help you with editing the wiki?
For the record, link to the original discussion: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ta … Pulseaudio
Offline
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/firefox
"The factual accuracy of this article or section is disputed.
Reason: firefox depends on libpulse, not pulseaudio (Discuss in Talk:Firefox#Firefox and Pulseaudio)"
That's good to know; at one point I was starting FF with "apulse firefox" to get audio.
"If you do not change direction, you may end up where you are heading." -- L.T.
Offline
The package is compiled with --enable-alsa: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-p … GBUILD#L86
Isn't that clear enough?
Rules for problems.
Everyone has problems. Animals have problems. And buildings. And cats, and trees.
Problems are your friends. Treat them well.
Offline
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:The package is compiled with --enable-alsa: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-p … GBUILD#L86
Isn't that clear enough?
Since mozilla does not actively maintain the alsa code path, it may break from time to time, especially during sandbox changes.
| alias CUTF='LANG=en_XX.UTF-8@POSIX ' |
Offline
raphaelabb wrote:I have mentioned it in the Discussion tab on the article but didn't go further than that. I am not competent enough to change the Wiki, that's why I'm posting here.
I don't get this argument. How does posting the same question in a different place help you with editing the wiki?
For the record, link to the original discussion: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ta … Pulseaudio
Because a thread in the forum will get more views and therefore technical info on the subject than the wiki discussion.
Offline
Head_on_a_Stick wrote:The package is compiled with --enable-alsa: https://github.com/archlinux/svntogit-p … GBUILD#L86
Isn't that clear enough?
Yes it is.
Offline
Pages: 1