You are not logged in.
Why the wiki Installation guide do not mention archinstall?
I know it from Phoronix.
Offline
Why the wiki Installation guide do not mention archinstall?
Why should it. They are alternative approaches. There are pages that link to both the installation guide and archinstall information so a reader could choose one or the other.
I know it from Phoronix.
Generally this would indicate that something is either false, or grossly mischaracterized to the point of being pretty much false. I guess this is an exception, as archinstall does indeed exist. Though I suspect most of what phoronix would say about it is incorrect.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
This has been already discussed but archinstall (like systemd-firstboot) is considered too specific to be included in the page.
I'm french, don't mind my mistakes in english.
Offline
Why should it. They are alternative approaches. There are pages that link to both the installation guide and archinstall information so a reader could choose one or the other.
But a new user would go to archlinux.org, click on "Download", and then click on "Installation Guide".
He will be redirected to the Installation guide wiki page.
With no mention of archinstall.
How the new user knows about archinstall?
Generally this would indicate that something is either false, or grossly mischaracterized to the point of being pretty much false. I guess this is an exception, as archinstall does indeed exist. Though I suspect most of what phoronix would say about it is incorrect.
I don't understand what is false or mischaracterized.
Offline
New users shouldn't use archinstall.
Sakura:-
Mobo: MSI MAG X570S TORPEDO MAX // Processor: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X @4.9GHz // GFX: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT // RAM: 32GB (4x 8GB) Corsair DDR4 (@ 3000MHz) // Storage: 1x 3TB HDD, 6x 1TB SSD, 2x 120GB SSD, 1x 275GB M2 SSD
Making lemonade from lemons since 2015.
Online
How the new user knows about archinstall?
Archinstall is listed in Category:Installation process and the FAQ, which are respectively the third and fourth links in the installation guide.
New users shouldn't use archinstall.
To be completely fair, an exception would be if they have enough experience or time to do their research to understand each and every choice the installer will give them.
Last edited by Erus_Iluvatar (2023-11-09 14:49:26)
I'm french, don't mind my mistakes in english.
Offline
an exception would be if they have enough experience or time to do their research to understand each and every choice the installer will give them.
At which point they're not gonna use archinstall for a single-system installation.
New users shouldn't use archinstall.
I don't understand what is false or mischaracterized.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Arch-Linu … nstall-2.6
Archinstall 2.6 Released For Latest Easy-To-Use Arch Linux Installer
archinstall is not an "Easy-To-Use Arch Linux Installer"
Note:
On the installation iso you might stumble over an "archinstall" binary.
In stark contrast to its suggestive name, it is NOT meant to be used by you to install archlinux on your individual system, but a framework to script your own local mass deployment.
Offline
I don't understand what is false or mischaracterized.
I was referring to the source in general as being unreliable and the web equivalent of a tabloid.
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline
New users shouldn't use archinstall.
One reason I remember archinstall's inception was justified with was that it increases accessibility and thus benefits handicapped users.
Do you think they are not handycapped on their first install for some reason? :-D
Inofficial first vice president of the Rust Evangelism Strike Force
Offline
The installation guide explicitly links to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Instal … ty_options .
Are you sure new handicapped users are better off trying archinstall ?
Disliking systemd intensely, but not satisfied with alternatives so focusing on taming systemd.
clean chroot building not flexible enough ?
Try clean chroot manager by graysky
Offline
Are you sure new handicapped users are better off trying archinstall ?
Why would I be *sure* of something I did not even claim.
I recited the reasoning of a particular developer.
At any rate, I wouldn't know, since I am not currently affected by a handicap.
Inofficial first vice president of the Rust Evangelism Strike Force
Offline
(edit: cross posted with the above)
I think / hope schard was joking. In some of the debates of the value of the automated installer, it was claimed that the automated installer somehow increased accessibility for people with disabilities (a claim I called out as bullshit).
Last edited by Trilby (2023-11-09 17:20:11)
"UNIX is simple and coherent" - Dennis Ritchie; "GNU's Not Unix" - Richard Stallman
Offline