You are not logged in.
now that this forum has more tha 1000 users (1046 at the time of the writing) I think that Quick Reply should be there.
with Quick Reply one can reply (post) with only one click (request).
without it (as it is now) one has to do two clicks (requests).
is it me or with quick reply enabled the forum will gain 50% of speed?
think about it
Offline
never seen that feature before.... that being said i don't see the two click process you are talking about. unless you mean click (to start wrinting a post/reply), write your response, click to post. that lall i ever have to do and i don't understand how it can be shorter. :?
AKA uknowme
I am not your friend
Offline
use "links" or another console browser to surf the turbo-experience (i'm writing now from such a one)
the big advances:
- no images
- no advertisements
the little disadvantage:
- some links are shown double (has technical reasons: phpbb)
- it do not look that nice (detail)
but it is really fast!!
open a console and type:
links bbs.archlinux.org
you will feel the speed :-)
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
Just an example what Zeppelin meant
Offline
use "links" or another console browser to surf the turbo-experience (i'm writing now from such a one)
the big advances:
- no images
- no advertisementsthe little disadvantage:
- some links are shown double (has technical reasons: phpbb)
- it do not look that nice (detail)
but it is really fast!!
open a console and type:
links bbs.archlinux.org
you will feel the speed :-)
EDIT: of course you need to have links installed first
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
sorry, didnt want to quote myself ... it was that fast, that i didnt even read the text i pressed enter to :-)
The impossible missions are the only ones which succeed.
Offline
hmmm...sorry don't see it
AKA uknowme
I am not your friend
Offline
well anyways.. try some forums you might be a registered user, and you will find it.
I really hope the admin of this forum will think about my proposal.
TWO REQUESTS (reply and post) WILL BECOME ONE [just post]
Offline
Zeppelin, I'm not a member in Linux-Questions either. I guess the theory is to already provide a text-entry form by default - that's the only way I could imagine how this works.
dp, are the double links in links due to images ? In Lynx, at least you can chose to include links for images, or not.
Other "turbo" browsers : dillo (which I use almost exclusively, including for this post), or w3m - with w3m you have a text-browser with images - sort of cool.
Offline
Offline
well here is a screenshot of a quickreply. sorry i didn't know it's a feature only for registered users.
Offline
hey thanks i get it now. ..... i don't think phpbb offers that though.
AKA uknowme
I am not your friend
Offline
there IS for phpbb
Offline
ah okay i have just never seen it on a phpbb before i suppose.
AKA uknowme
I am not your friend
Offline
I agree this would be a good idea if possible. I always use this on LQ. Once you've learned the codes/smileys, there's no need to do it the long way anymore.
Offline
I would imagine and hope that phpBB 2.2 will release with the ability to have quick reply as a default setting... but for now us sorry 2.0.x users will have to sufice with a BETA mod... I've gone through the trouble of even finding it for you guys, cause Im actually considering applying it to my own forums... if Arch forums just installs EasyMOD this thing can go in and start working in a couple of minutes.
Link to Qucik Reply mod (BETA) for phpBB v2.0.6: http://www.phpbb.com/phpBB/viewtopic.ph … uick+reply
I agree 100% with zeppelin that this will save bandwidth (provided people use it). I ALWAYS use the quick reply on GooeyLinux, but that's invision so of course it has Quick Reply. If this will be a serious consideration by the admins here, I will have no problems installing it on my fourms first to make sure it will go in right on here. And of COURSE, always BACKUP.
John Gallias
Technician/Friend/Bassist
http://www.concretearmy.com
john@concretearmy.com
john.gallias@gmail.com
Arch Linux v0.7 (Wombat), XFce 4.2, XOrg, Firefox
Offline
I'm glad raising up an issue that almost everyone seems to agree with me
I believe about 30% of the avg users use Quick Reply [but even that means less server bandwitdh ]
ps. Archers are not avg users
Offline
Sample on phpbb2.0.x
Offline
Mindaugas,
so you bought Opera.
Offline
Mindaugas,
so you bought Opera.
:mrgreen:
Offline
that's why I would recommend: Mozilla-FireFox
Offline
use "links" or another console browser to surf the turbo-experience (i'm writing now from such a one)
Using links, lynx, elinks, or any other text browser, how do you tell which threads have new posts? I rely on the little colored bells on the left to know which forums and threads have new posts. Do these graphical indicators translate into some obvious text indicator in a non-GUI browser?
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream." - S. Jackson
Offline
little colored bells
Um, okay, maybe they're not "bells" :oops: Whatever they are ... notes? ... they change color when there is an unread post.
"No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream." - S. Jackson
Offline
yes, they do translate into a text equivalent. on my forums i have pared it down a bit, it was too long to be useful for any real posting. i think i am going to write a new template for my forums though, specifically for text browsing. my main site works fine for that, though. i'm thinking im going to do it in xml.
Offline