You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
Extra 3.8.2
http://archlinux.org/packages/search/?r … =&limit=50
but!
Offline
The package in extra is built from source, the one in AUR is a dirty binary. When I imported junit into testing, I kept this version specifically because the newer 4.x junit versions either didn't build from source, or had compatibility problems with the packages I needed it for.
Offline
build.xml for 4.4
http://junit.cvs.sourceforge.net/junit/ … iew=markup
P.S.
I make new build.xml for compile junit 4.4 next week.
Last edited by skipper13 (2007-09-05 08:50:15)
Offline
Offline
Why don't you split package to hamcrest-core and junit?
Offline
Offline
4.4 is too old. Current version is 4.6.
Offline
You should really file a bug for this (bugs.archlinux.org).
Offline
I have reported a Suppor Request.
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14416
But it has just closed
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List
Mr. Bash, it's Extra, not Unsupported! It's flagged for months. Move to Unsupported and volunteers will update a package.
Last edited by skipper13 (2009-04-21 17:25:05)
Offline
Mr. Bash, it's Extra, not Unsupported! It's flagged for months. Move to Unsupported and volunteers will update a package.
Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List
you should send a message on Mailing List (arch-general) with your request
Last edited by ilpianista (2009-04-21 19:03:48)
Offline
Pages: 1