You are not logged in.

#1 2007-09-01 17:06:49

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Offline

#2 2007-09-01 23:38:59

JGC
Developer
Registered: 2003-12-03
Posts: 1,664

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

The package in extra is built from source, the one in AUR is a dirty binary. When I imported junit into testing, I kept this version specifically because the newer 4.x junit versions either didn't build from source, or had compatibility problems with the packages I needed it for.

Offline

#3 2007-09-05 08:48:23

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

build.xml for 4.4
http://junit.cvs.sourceforge.net/junit/ … iew=markup

P.S.
I make new build.xml for compile junit 4.4 next week.

Last edited by skipper13 (2007-09-05 08:50:15)

Offline

#4 2007-09-09 12:55:09

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

I suggest package junit 4.4 (make from source).

PKGBUILD
build.xml

Offline

#5 2007-09-13 19:33:37

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

Why don't you split package to hamcrest-core and junit?

Offline

#6 2008-01-01 22:33:25

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

Remove junit from extra, please.

Offline

#7 2009-04-21 16:15:13

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

4.4 is too old. Current version is 4.6.

https://sourceforge.net/project/shownot … p_id=15278

Offline

#8 2009-04-21 17:02:13

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

You should really file a bug for this (bugs.archlinux.org).

Offline

#9 2009-04-21 17:17:14

skipper13
Member
From: Kharkiv, Ukraine, QTH KN89DX
Registered: 2006-11-27
Posts: 67
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

I have reported a Suppor Request.

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14416

But it has just closed sad

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List

Mr. Bash, it's Extra, not Unsupported! It's flagged for months. Move to Unsupported and volunteers will update a package.

Last edited by skipper13 (2009-04-21 17:25:05)

Offline

#10 2009-04-21 19:01:10

ilpianista
Fellow developer
Registered: 2007-10-06
Posts: 568
Website

Re: junit (extra): why 3.8?

skipper13 wrote:

Mr. Bash, it's Extra, not Unsupported! It's flagged for months. Move to Unsupported and volunteers will update a package.

Do NOT report bugs when a package is just outdated, or it is in Unsupported. Use the 'flag out of date' link on the package page, or the Mailing List

you should send a message on Mailing List (arch-general) with your request

Last edited by ilpianista (2009-04-21 19:03:48)

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB