You are not logged in.

#1 2007-11-13 17:27:22

jaideep_jdof
Member
From: Delhi, India
Registered: 2006-06-05
Posts: 311

Boot splash such a trouble

Why is getting a boot splash on archlinux such a trouble sad. First download source then patch and then so on so forth hmm. How much trouble is to add boot splash patch be default, it wouldn't increase the size of the kernel drastically. Or creating a single package to enable boot splash.

Last edited by jaideep_jdof (2007-11-13 17:27:42)

Offline

#2 2007-11-13 19:26:42

oliwer
Member
From: Paris
Registered: 2007-06-30
Posts: 153
Website

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

I agree on that. I know that Arch's law is to KISS, but seriously : who doesn't like boot splash ?

Offline

#3 2007-11-13 19:28:16

kumico
Member
Registered: 2007-09-28
Posts: 224
Website

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

i don't
and beside ,, i don't know why you're ranting here . i don't care, and prolly no-one else either ,,
if you want a feature added ,, you know where the bug tracker is

Offline

#4 2007-11-13 19:39:40

jaideep_jdof
Member
From: Delhi, India
Registered: 2006-06-05
Posts: 311

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

kumico wrote:

i don't
and beside ,, i don't know why you're ranting here . i don't care, and prolly no-one else either ,,
if you want a feature added ,, you know where the bug tracker is

Why this tone. We all have our opinions.

Offline

#5 2007-11-13 20:03:10

Ben-Hayman
Member
From: Lincolnshire, UK
Registered: 2007-10-18
Posts: 7
Website

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

I have to agree, I do like bootsplash. But still, everyone should have their opinions and they can install it for themselves. That way Arch still manages to KISS and people can make it what they want!


Ben Hayman: I :heart: Arch

Offline

#6 2007-11-13 20:29:51

3nd3r
Member
From: /dev/null
Registered: 2002-12-08
Posts: 301
Website

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

I agree, Arch should be a bit easier to use bootsplash. It should come with the options, not after hacking a thousand confs.. but that is just my 2 cents tongue

Offline

#7 2007-11-13 20:42:55

miggols99
Member
Registered: 2007-06-10
Posts: 424

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

I would also like a bootsplash. Raymano tried to get the devs to patch the kernel with the fbcondecor patch, but they refused saying "we don't want to add random features to the kernel. We want to stay as vanilla as possible." sad

Offline

#8 2007-11-14 06:03:04

jaideep_jdof
Member
From: Delhi, India
Registered: 2006-06-05
Posts: 311

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

One single package for bootsplash, wouldn't it be great.

Offline

#9 2007-11-14 09:30:29

Mikko777
Member
From: Suomi, Finland
Registered: 2006-10-30
Posts: 837

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

Bootsplash is useless in arch due to the fast boottime tongue

...Still if it was enabled by default, I'd surely use it! (I thought the devs already agreed to put it in the kernel?)

Offline

#10 2007-11-14 11:07:45

roodie
Member
Registered: 2007-06-27
Posts: 14

Re: Boot splash such a trouble

I didn't want to patch kernel. I don't like the standard boot, so I'm experimenting with splashy.
What I really want is a 12 second boot. During the boot some nice flashing thing indicating there is progress,
and some error-messages in case of problems. Like some indication of fsck. If that happens, I can go
back to bed and sleep another hour or so.


----
      g8m

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB