You are not logged in.
It seems that I'm getting a nice stream of views but no replies to my previous post (can you say "TLDR"?), and since the fact that I have no IRC client is rather an urgent matter (:P) let me sum it up in a shorter post, in the hope that someone'll respond:
I find irssi hard to use, not because of the fact that it's a console client - in fact, I'd love a system where everything was accomplished by console apps and tools - but I find irssi's window management impossible to comprehend, and, therefore, work with. So, what do you recommend as a console IRC client with "sane" window management? I just want the ability to tell windows that they cannot "move", and I want a client that doesn't go insane from a window management perspective if I start joining or leaving networks regularly.
I'd say more but then people'll probably TLDR this post out as well
-dav7
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
Try to make your topic at least a little bit relevant to your post. "UGH... I need pointers [...] - Smaller post" is completely meaningless.
Offline
tomk: Hi, I have no problems with you deleting this post, as I won't be able to think of a good topic until I find a new IRC client. Yes, it's a cyclic loop, but when things aren't working properly with my PCs I can't think straight - I'm having problems formulating this message.
Thanks... or you could rename it.
-dav7
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
You're complaining about no answers after just over an hour
Great reason to double post!
Anyway, until someone who uses a CLI IRC client other than irssi comes along, you can look here for a nice list of irc clients available. Look at the ones supporting linux:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison … at_clients
btw, editting the first post allows you to change the title
Last edited by dyscoria (2008-04-07 09:58:50)
flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)
Offline
Thanks for the list... I'd spent a while pouring over it before posting. And I know that about editing the first post; the thing was that I didn't know what to call the post, since my brain was effectively "broken". I still don't, heh.
But I've gone back to irssi now... I have no idea if I'll be able to like it or if I'll explode again. So this discussion is still open!
-dav7
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
Here, let me suggest a title for you: "Alternative to irssi"
Or maybe: "Recommend a CLI irc client (but not irssi)"
Or even: "Need urgent help"
I'll let you figure out which one of the above three would be inappropriate
[Yes, my mind breaks too when I don't like an application. The other day when the svn build of mplayer broke, I had to get therapy.]
flack 2.0.6: menu-driven BASH script to easily tag FLAC files (AUR)
knock-once 1.2: BASH script to easily create/send one-time sequences for knockd (forum/AUR)
Offline
I use weechat. I love it, does everything I need. Not so sure how window management works; I keep each chat room/server info log in its own "buffer" or "window" and switch between them with ALT+left or ALT+right
Offline
+1 for weechat, it's my IRC client of choice, even though I don't IRC that much. I loved it exactly for its window management capabilities (especially the ability to split the screen however you like).
Have you Syued today?
Free music for free people! | Earthlings
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- A. de Saint-Exupery
Offline
I see. I tried WeeChat out on my server, and I'm sad to say that even without having connected to any servers, its performance seemed sluggish, despite running on a 500MHz P3 with 320MB RAM (and of course Arch). Just an IRCd was running.
So.... is WC actually "slow" that way?
By "slow" I mean that I'd have an 80ms or so delay between new input lines, and scrolling seemed really unresponsive. Maybe WC has some kind of slowdown factor going on...? Btw, I checked the scripts folder and there was nothing there (of course).
-dav7
Windows was made for looking at success from a distance through a wall of oversimplicity. Linux removes the wall, so you can just walk up to success and make it your own.
--
Reinventing the wheel is fun. You get to redefine pi.
Offline
As for me it's quite snappy. Couldn't spot any difference in speed between weechat and irssi.
Have you Syued today?
Free music for free people! | Earthlings
"Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away." -- A. de Saint-Exupery
Offline
+1 for weechat, really great irc client
Offline