You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I was wondering if it was possible to upgrade to Arch64 without a reinstall. Now, if the upgrade is going to be harder than a reinstall I won't do it - I have a separate /home, it's not like I'll lose much. But I was just thinking that if I replaced all instances of i686 in /etc/pacman.d/mirrorlist with x86_64, then -Syu'ed, it may sort of fix itself up. I know I'd have to definitely change makepkg.conf, and a few other architecture-specific settings, but the very way Arch updates seems like it would be possible to do a full architecture switch.
I originally installed i686 because I didn't want to deal with the hassle of a 32-bit chroot for running Firefox with java, flash, etc...but I've read up on it a bit and it doesn't look that hard, so I was thinking of using my chip to it's fullest with Arch64.
Has anyone done this? Does anyone know if or why this will destroy my install? These are the things I want to know.
Last edited by Redroar (2008-06-03 01:49:40)
Stop looking at my signature. It betrays your nature.
Offline
Offline
Reinstall is necessary/easiest solution. Just backup your /etc.
Offline
Thank you for the extremely fast replies. Reinstall is not that bad...I actually should be able to get it going pretty quickly, I think.
EDIT: I just saw that at the bottom of the Arch64 FAQ...I looked over it, but obviously not hard enough.
Last edited by Redroar (2008-06-03 01:50:33)
Stop looking at my signature. It betrays your nature.
Offline
This may be on benefit for you:
http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php? … 04#p369404
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
Many thanks for the wonderful script. This will make it much quicker to get all my packages back. Though I think that -Qqe would be a better option since it wouldn't 'double-install' dependencies very often. Plus, it would keep the 'explicitly installed' list intact, otherwise -Rs would be near useless because with the original script I think every single package will be installed explicitly.
But it is still a big time-saver, I won't have to go hunting down packages.
Stop looking at my signature. It betrays your nature.
Offline
You're probably correct - I threw that script together in Firefox while eating lunch, so there's probably lots of room for improvement
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
Pages: 1