oh boy [CLx]

sarah31 · 2004-07-13 04:17:50

http://perllinux.sourceforge.net/

Mr Green · 2004-07-13 09:22:49

Err like Why???

Emmm all in Python

Mr Green

lanrat · 2004-07-13 10:48:55

I just saw it on osnews.com :-) It even has a screenshot ;-)

aCoder · 2004-07-15 03:24:46

Yukk!!! Perl!!!

How about PyLinux? :twisted:

sarah31 · 2004-07-15 03:54:20

mmmmm py (pie)

Dusty · 2004-07-15 15:36:04

How bout bash Linux? You could run all the programs either as C programs or as bash scripts from the commandline (and not have the command line differentiate). Now that would be something else! In fact, if you wanted you could also run PERL or Python progrmas from the same command line. Now that's variety!

dp · 2004-07-15 15:56:39

http://www.uclinux.org/

Dusty · 2004-07-15 16:26:43

dp and his infinite collection of links...

dp colected links
and google created the database
and dmoz categorized the database
and dp said it was good
on the 7th day
dp rested

sarah31 · 2004-07-15 17:46:42

bah ANYONE could have good links. ...... they just have to have no life

dp · 2004-07-15 22:17:14

Dusty wrote:

dp and his infinite collection of links...
dp colected links
and google created the database
and dmoz categorized the database
and dp said it was good
on the 7th day
dp rested

they are not infinite!! you cannot have files bigger than 2GB in size ... no, just joking --- but i agree with Sarah31: anyone can have good links!

(but what i do not understand is the second part of the post: "..... they just have to have no life " -> "have to sth. = must" => "they just must have no life" - how can links have a life?)

sarah31 · 2004-07-15 22:24:15

dp wrote:

anyone can have good links!

i prefer sausage links.

Dusty · 2004-07-16 01:00:39

I remember when it was impossible to lure Sarah into an off topic conversation... guess it's polar bear bait...

sarah31 · 2004-07-16 04:41:33

Dusty wrote:

I remember when it was impossible to lure Sarah into an off topic conversation... guess it's polar bear bait...

just mention food and i am into the conversation.

whatah · 2004-07-16 05:28:12

how about 'rubyx'? google it, i am too lazy to post a link.

dp · 2004-07-16 15:20:08

whatah wrote:

how about 'rubyx'? google it, i am too lazy to post a link.

google says

http://www.rubyx.org/

and i wonder about the possibilities of ruby

dp · 2004-07-16 15:26:40

sarah31 wrote:

Dusty wrote:
I remember when it was impossible to lure Sarah into an off topic conversation... guess it's polar bear bait...
just mention food and i am into the conversation.

look what i made for dinner

:-)

tmadhavan · 2004-07-17 18:44:23

You people spend far too much time trawling around looking for pictures of whatever you're talking about...

But hey, it's more constructive than anything I have to say

dp · 2004-07-17 21:52:39

tmadhavan wrote:

You people spend far too much time trawling around looking for pictures of whatever you're talking about...

i never post pictures not made by me without telling from where they come: this pic is taken especially to represent my dinner yesterday :-) (click on it to have it bigger)

tmadhavan wrote:

But hey, it's more constructive than anything I have to say

that's true - it IS constructive :-)

Arch Linux

#1 2004-07-13 04:17:50

oh boy [CLx]

#2 2004-07-13 09:22:49

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#3 2004-07-13 10:48:55

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#4 2004-07-15 03:24:46

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#5 2004-07-15 03:54:20

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#6 2004-07-15 15:36:04

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#7 2004-07-15 15:56:39

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#8 2004-07-15 16:26:43

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#9 2004-07-15 17:46:42

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#10 2004-07-15 22:17:14

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#11 2004-07-15 22:24:15

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#12 2004-07-16 01:00:39

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#13 2004-07-16 04:41:33

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#14 2004-07-16 05:28:12

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#15 2004-07-16 15:20:08

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#16 2004-07-16 15:26:40

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#17 2004-07-17 18:44:23

Re: oh boy [CLx]

#18 2004-07-17 21:52:39

Re: oh boy [CLx]

Board footer