You are not logged in.

#1 2009-01-25 00:36:18

ShadowKyogre
Member
From: Hell! XP No... I'm not telling
Registered: 2008-12-19
Posts: 476
Website

Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved to the official KDEMod Repos?

Last edited by ShadowKyogre (2009-01-25 00:36:38)


For every problem, there is a solution that is:
Clean
Simple and most of all...wrong!
Github page

Offline

#2 2009-01-25 00:47:19

Xyne
Administrator/PM
Registered: 2008-08-03
Posts: 6,963
Website

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

I think this generally applies to the question of advisability of using anything in a "testing" repo:

If you want to help the devs find bugs and speed up its inclusion in the stable repo and it isn't mission-critical, then yes.
If instability can pose a serious problem for you, then no.


My Arch Linux StuffForum EtiquetteCommunity Ethos - Arch is not for everyone

Offline

#3 2009-01-25 00:51:05

ShadowKyogre
Member
From: Hell! XP No... I'm not telling
Registered: 2008-12-19
Posts: 476
Website

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

Well...it is only 2 days before KDE 4.2 officially comes out...so I think waiting would be the best thing.


For every problem, there is a solution that is:
Clean
Simple and most of all...wrong!
Github page

Offline

#4 2009-01-25 00:55:44

Xyne
Administrator/PM
Registered: 2008-08-03
Posts: 6,963
Website

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

If there are only a few days left, then I would wait. I would probably even wait a bit longer to see what issues others have first.


My Arch Linux StuffForum EtiquetteCommunity Ethos - Arch is not for everyone

Offline

#5 2009-01-25 01:06:04

ShadowKyogre
Member
From: Hell! XP No... I'm not telling
Registered: 2008-12-19
Posts: 476
Website

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

Yeah.


For every problem, there is a solution that is:
Clean
Simple and most of all...wrong!
Github page

Offline

#6 2009-01-25 06:25:35

tanis
Member
From: Poland / Waterloo, ON, Canada
Registered: 2007-04-21
Posts: 259

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

kdemod is in [testing]?
I thought kdemod had its own repositories?

Offline

#7 2009-01-25 07:42:48

mcmillan
Member
Registered: 2006-04-06
Posts: 737

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

tanis wrote:

kdemod is in [testing]?
I thought kdemod had its own repositories?

kdemod has it's own testing repository. I've been running it for a couple weeks without any issues, but like you said if it's due to move to stable in a few days you might as well wait for the official release.

Offline

#8 2009-01-25 07:57:31

kaola_linux
Member
From: Bacolod City/Philippines
Registered: 2008-09-23
Posts: 513

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

I installed today kdemod using [kdemod-testing] repo over my XFCE4...My keyboard is not working upon staring kdm only mouse does...Downgraded hal maybe it would help but still the same sit...Now, I can no longer type when Slim starts as well...I'm on a total mess...:(

Reinstalling kdemod now hope it helps...:|

Any workarounds?

Btw: I had enabled [testing], is this the cause of my prob?:/

Last edited by kaola_linux (2009-01-25 08:02:42)


Netbook (Acer Aspire One 110 || 160gb SATA HD || 1.5gb ram): archlinux i686 / KDEmod 4.3
Registered Linux User # 481212 / Machine Registration # 390468
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Offline

#9 2009-01-25 07:58:03

tanis
Member
From: Poland / Waterloo, ON, Canada
Registered: 2007-04-21
Posts: 259

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

So why didn't he ask in kdemod's forum?
By the way, what's the difference between kdemod 4.2 and kde 4.2 in official [testing] repo?

Offline

#10 2009-01-25 08:00:10

kaola_linux
Member
From: Bacolod City/Philippines
Registered: 2008-09-23
Posts: 513

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

tanis wrote:

So why didn't he ask in kdemod's forum?
By the way, what's the difference between kdemod 4.2 and kde 4.2 in official [testing] repo?

kdemod is a tweaked version and modular while kde on the [testing] repos is vanilla AFAIK smile


Netbook (Acer Aspire One 110 || 160gb SATA HD || 1.5gb ram): archlinux i686 / KDEmod 4.3
Registered Linux User # 481212 / Machine Registration # 390468
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Offline

#11 2009-01-25 09:56:30

funkyou
Member
From: Berlin, DE
Registered: 2006-03-19
Posts: 848
Website

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

kaola_linux wrote:
tanis wrote:

So why didn't he ask in kdemod's forum?
By the way, what's the difference between kdemod 4.2 and kde 4.2 in official [testing] repo?

kdemod is a tweaked version and modular while kde on the [testing] repos is vanilla AFAIK smile

The KDEmod KDE 4 packages are vanilla too, apart from only one backport applied to them.

Beside of that, you have

- split packages
- packages with debugging symbols
- some small extra bugfixes that are not in the packages in [extra], like an increased X timeout for KDM (which solves problems like this one)

Oh, and 4.2 is running fine and you dont need to enable [testing] for it - we have included all necessary dependencies in our repos...


want a modular and tweaked KDE for arch? try kdemod

Offline

#12 2009-01-25 10:32:54

kaola_linux
Member
From: Bacolod City/Philippines
Registered: 2008-09-23
Posts: 513

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

funkyou wrote:

Oh, and 4.2 is running fine and you dont need to enable [testing] for it - we have included all necessary dependencies in our repos...

Thanks...I had [testing] enabled for networkmanager 0.7...:)


Netbook (Acer Aspire One 110 || 160gb SATA HD || 1.5gb ram): archlinux i686 / KDEmod 4.3
Registered Linux User # 481212 / Machine Registration # 390468
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Offline

#13 2009-01-25 18:08:04

AdeBe
Member
From: Warsaw
Registered: 2008-12-28
Posts: 8

Re: Is it advisable to go to KDEMod 4.2 in testing before it is moved?

I'm using kdemod 4.2 now, upgraded today. Generally it's awesome, but desktop effects are TERRIBLY slow. I've had to turn them off, desktop was just unusable with them. Old 4.1 was ok. Graphic card is gma945

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB