You are not logged in.

#1 2009-02-28 22:22:54

playdafunkimuzic
Member
Registered: 2008-10-25
Posts: 220

E17 won't install as per wiki

I'm trying to install it using easy-e17.sh i added the repo in my pacman.conf, running pacman -Sy is fine, it says that rfad is up to date. however, when i go pacman -S easy-e17 it says the package cannot be found

Offline

#2 2009-02-28 22:32:51

haxit
Member
From: /home/haxit
Registered: 2008-03-04
Posts: 1,247
Website

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

playdafunkimuzic wrote:

I'm trying to install it using easy-e17.sh i added the repo in my pacman.conf, running pacman -Sy is fine, it says that rfad is up to date. however, when i go pacman -S easy-e17 it says the package cannot be found

Yes, the package is not avaiable. The PKGBUILD is broken and it will be updated as soon as it is fixed. Sorry for the inconvenience.


Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.

Offline

#3 2009-02-28 22:46:16

haxit
Member
From: /home/haxit
Registered: 2008-03-04
Posts: 1,247
Website

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

I uploaded the version, with edited PKGBUILD (took out xserver-xorg dependency, wth is that tongue) and it says it is corrupted. If you want, give it a go, but I am not too hopeful.


Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.

Offline

#4 2009-02-28 22:50:52

playdafunkimuzic
Member
Registered: 2008-10-25
Posts: 220

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

after looking at your screenshots...do you like openbox better than e17? why?

Offline

#5 2009-02-28 22:52:05

haxit
Member
From: /home/haxit
Registered: 2008-03-04
Posts: 1,247
Website

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

playdafunkimuzic wrote:

after looking at your screenshots...do you like openbox better than e17? why?

Lol, I don't use easy-e17, I just have it in my repo, it was requested, by the maintainer.

Last edited by haxit (2009-02-28 22:52:18)


Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.

Offline

#6 2009-03-02 20:51:46

haxit
Member
From: /home/haxit
Registered: 2008-03-04
Posts: 1,247
Website

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

Its fixed now.


Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.

Offline

#7 2009-03-02 21:02:51

skottish
Forum Fellow
From: Here
Registered: 2006-06-16
Posts: 7,942

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

Just out of curiosity, why aren't people just doing 'pacman -S e17-svn e17-extra-svn'? Does easy-e17 bring anything to the table for most users?

Offline

#8 2009-03-02 21:28:12

Inxsible
Forum Fellow
From: Chicago
Registered: 2008-06-09
Posts: 9,183

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

skottish wrote:

Just out of curiosity, why aren't people just doing 'pacman -S e17-svn e17-extra-svn'? Does easy-e17 bring anything to the table for most users?

I think easy-e17 is just a script that asks you a bunch of questions and gets the same thing. A little interactive that's all. Correct me if I am wrong.


Forum Rules

There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !

Offline

#9 2009-03-02 22:08:39

haxit
Member
From: /home/haxit
Registered: 2008-03-04
Posts: 1,247
Website

Re: E17 won't install as per wiki

Inxsible wrote:
skottish wrote:

Just out of curiosity, why aren't people just doing 'pacman -S e17-svn e17-extra-svn'? Does easy-e17 bring anything to the table for most users?

I think easy-e17 is just a script that asks you a bunch of questions and gets the same thing. A little interactive that's all. Correct me if I am wrong.

From what I saw, it doesn't ask anything tongue


Archi686 User | Old Screenshots | Old .Configs
Vi veri universum vivus vici.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB