You are not logged in.
No, it's not an April Fool! The first issue of Arch User Magazine has finally been released! It's a bit shorter than I would have liked, but hey, it's a start right? Besides, the more you contribute, the better it will become!
Check out our website at http://archuser.com
Direct download link for Issue 1 here
Offline
Nice work! I enjoyed reading the first issue.
BTW "To install Bluefish, use the `geany`"! Wow, that would be strange...
Offline
Nice. FYI: kate is part of kdesdk and not kdebase.
Offline
Very very nice
Offline
BTW "To install Bluefish, use the `geany`"! Wow, that would be strange...
Oops! Fixed.
Nice. FYI: kate is part of kdesdk and not kdebase.
Really? Last time I installed KDE it was in base... in fact the Kate website still lists it as there. Oh well, you'd know wouldn't you. Fixed!
Everyone: Thanks!
Offline
great job!
Offline
Great work, it was a good read
Last edited by strankan (2009-04-02 07:56:37)
Offline
Awesome job! Although you misspelled "rant" on the last page
Stand back, intruder, or i'll blast you out of space! I am Klixon and I don't want any dealings with you human lifeforms. I'm a cyborg!
Offline
well done! i really enjoyed reading it!
Offline
Excellent - very useful range of content and nicely presented.
Well done to all concerned!
Offline
Awesome job! Although you misspelled "rant" on the last page
I see what you did there.
archlinux - please read this and this — twice — then ask questions.
--
http://rsontech.net | http://github.com/rson
Offline
Well done. Nice reading, especially commandline-fu. Long ago I've read how to change back to previous directory and forgot that command. Now thx for reminding me of `cd -`
On page 4 I found a typo: last sentence in first column reads
If you want a little help
slimming down .your options, please read
on.
The period between "down" and "your" should be removed(?)
Offline
After reading the DE comparison I have to complain a little (or even a lot). This really sound like the usual trolling that can be found on the net everywhere. Did you really use those different DEs on a production system for at least several weeks?
KDE: Never compare any DE to Windows. They are very different. Comparing the size of the different DEs is useless. If youz install whole KDE you get a lot more apps than any other DE offers. And I don't think KDE is dedicated to beginners; its focused on "power users", which does not mean beginners cannot use it. And I don't get it why eye candy does imply decrease of simplicity. Don't forget that KDE 4 has change in alot of these aspects compared to KDE 3.
Gnome: It has different goals than KDE. They focus on a simple UI which does not confuse computer beginners. Gnome also has a clean and consitent look. And that Gnome uses less RAM than KDE is just not true. Their usage is very similar. Also, Gnome is nice for people who just want to use their PC and don't spend any time in customizing. So its quite ideal for the so called office PC.
XFCE: Well, people often say that it is lightweight. But at least with recent versions I don't see any difference to Gnome in performance or memory usage. And of course it is not as full-featured as Gnome or even KDE.
So, I hope you don't get me wrong. I just wanted to point out that's very difficult to compare different DEs. (apples and oranges, you know?) They all have different goals. The best way is to outline those and maybe show up- and downsides. But be carefull with comparing.
What about this: let people who acutally use a certain DE present it to show its benifits and problems. So you would have some kind of "DE of the month" and the user may decided which one fits his needs best.
Offline
By the way, E17 does NOT depend on a proprietary toolkit. It doesn't really have an official toolkit, but there are some based on the EFL such as ETK or EWL.
Offline
I am nitpicking, but Page 5 last word "intentional" is spelt wrong-- "intentionalf" -- an additional "f"
Page 6 - "Dwm is probably the smalles" - missing t in smallest
Last edited by Inxsible (2009-04-02 16:26:07)
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
I am nitpicking, but Page 5 last word "intentional" is spelt wrong-- "intentionalf" -- an additional "f"
Page 6 - "Dwm is probably the smalles" - missing t in smallest
Are you looking at the same thing I am? The only time the word intentional is used in the whole magazine it's "intentionally" and it's spelled right. And dwm is on page 5 - and the t isn't missing.
Edit: I guess I'm just nitpicking the nitpick.
Last edited by Ghost1227 (2009-04-02 16:43:41)
Offline
Inxsible wrote:I am nitpicking, but Page 5 last word "intentional" is spelt wrong-- "intentionalf" -- an additional "f"
Page 6 - "Dwm is probably the smalles" - missing t in smallest
Are you looking at the same thing I am? The only time the word intentional is used in the whole magazine it's "intentionally" and it's spelled right. And dwm is on page 5 - and the t isn't missing.
Edit: I guess I'm just nitpicking the nitpick.
I just used the download link you gave.
Aah !! I am glad I have the copy of the pdf. Let me show you the screenies...
Last edited by Inxsible (2009-04-02 16:54:44)
There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots !
Offline
I don't know if it's been said anywhere, but is there a maillist or something like that for the issues? I can't really check all the time (and I regged even)
Furthermore, *downloaded* Gonna read a bit later, when I'm through with my work.
My coding blog (or an attempt at it)
Archer start page (or an attempt at it)
Offline
Ghost1227 wrote:Inxsible wrote:I am nitpicking, but Page 5 last word "intentional" is spelt wrong-- "intentionalf" -- an additional "f"
Page 6 - "Dwm is probably the smalles" - missing t in smallest
Are you looking at the same thing I am? The only time the word intentional is used in the whole magazine it's "intentionally" and it's spelled right. And dwm is on page 5 - and the t isn't missing.
Edit: I guess I'm just nitpicking the nitpick.
I just used the download link you gave.
Aah !! I am glad I have the copy of the pdf. Let me show you the screenies...
Uhm, your looking at the PREVIEW ....... not the newest version.
Try this LINK instead.
Last edited by crouse (2009-04-02 17:17:40)
Offline
Great! keep up the good work!
and design is pretty cool...
Offline
cool.., I hope you can improve the format though.. with all the amazing web technologies out there why choose pdf?
Offline
cool.., I hope you can improve the format though.. with all the amazing web technologies out there why choose pdf?
What would you recommend? It's gotta be a format that can be downloaded as a single file... Just about every other magazine uses pdf for downloads. Got any suggestions?
Offline
Nice, it will be a nice reading I'm sure. For me, pdf is fine, for offline reading, as I'm not always connected.
Thanks!
box1: Arch (linux-3.17-rc5)
box2: Gentoo (linux-3.17-rc5)
wm: subtle
Offline