You are not logged in.
Pages: 1
I don't know, it is 4 AM here right now, but to me 3.6-1 looks newer than 3.53-1
EDIT: Don't ask me why I posted screenshots instead of just text...
Last edited by moljac024 (2009-05-30 01:49:20)
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
53 > 6 so 3.53 > 3.6... If upstream are using stupid number then the maintainer should use "force". I see there is a 3.6-2 now so maybe that got fixed.
Offline
iphitus@tsiolkovsky:~$ vercmp
usage: vercmp <ver1> <ver2>
return values:
< 0 : if ver1 < ver2
0 : if ver1 == ver2
> 0 : if ver1 > ver2
iphitus@tsiolkovsky:~$ vercmp 3.6 3.53
-1
6<53. Upstream probably meant .60.
BaSh has just uploaded a new package with the force option set, so that it will update properly:
http://repos.archlinux.org/viewvc.cgi/c … ev=CURRENT
edit: Allan wins.
Last edited by iphitus (2009-05-30 02:12:28)
Offline
Right, I feel silly now....I'm just gonna go to bed...
The day Microsoft makes a product that doesn't suck, is the day they make a vacuum cleaner.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But if they tell you that I've lost my mind, maybe it's not gone just a little hard to find...
Offline
And what about rtorrent and libtorrent? I was really a bit confused about this downgrade in the repos. Should I stick with the version installed on my machine or would it be better do downgrade to that in the repos?
Offline
Read the comments on rtorrent's AUR page - it was upgraded to 0.8.4, the current unstable release, and then downgraded again to 0.8.2.
(I'm still using 0.8.4, btw - works fine )
Offline
Ah okay, thanks Then I'll stay with 0.8.4 as well, no problems so far
Offline
Pages: 1