You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 2009-06-12 23:58:46
- fukawi2
- Ex-Administratorino
- From: .vic.au
- Registered: 2007-09-28
- Posts: 6,224
- Website
CC GPL vs GPL
I'm writing a PKGBUILD for a project which declares it's licence at being the "Creative Commons GPL":
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/GPL/2.0/
As best I can tell, this is the same licence as GPLv2. So should the PKGBUILD use 'GPL2' or 'custom' as the licence?
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
#2 2009-06-13 01:52:32
- Allan
- Pacman
- From: Brisbane, AU
- Registered: 2007-06-09
- Posts: 11,403
- Website
Re: CC GPL vs GPL
That is not actually a license, but rather an overview of a license. I'd just put GPL...
Offline
#3 2009-06-13 01:58:03
- droog
- Member
- Registered: 2004-11-18
- Posts: 877
Re: CC GPL vs GPL
I agree creative commons always bugged me but the link you posted is just a fancified post using the gpl as far as i can see.
Offline
#4 2009-06-13 03:04:31
- fukawi2
- Ex-Administratorino
- From: .vic.au
- Registered: 2007-09-28
- Posts: 6,224
- Website
Re: CC GPL vs GPL
Yeah, upon closer inspection, the normal GPL 'COPYING' file is distributed with the source, and it's version 2, so I'll go with GPL2. Thanks guys 
Last edited by fukawi2 (2009-06-13 03:04:50)
Are you familiar with our Forum Rules, and How To Ask Questions The Smart Way?
BlueHackers // fscanary // resticctl
Offline
Pages: 1