You are not logged in.

#1 2009-07-01 13:27:14

markg85
Member
Registered: 2009-06-27
Posts: 153

[request] Php 5.3

Hi,

Yesterday php 5.3 got released.
Something you (the person making the PKGBUILD) should know is that PHP 5.3 has MySQLND in it but for linux disabled by default. Please turn that on since it should provide equal or better performance then the libmysq one.

Thanx,
Mark

Offline

#2 2009-07-01 13:30:00

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: [request] Php 5.3

markg85 wrote:

Hi,

Yesterday php 5.3 got released.
Something you (the person making the PKGBUILD) should know is that PHP 5.3 has MySQLND in it but for linux disabled by default. Please turn that on since it should provide equal or better performance then the libmysq one.

Thanx,
Mark

This should be posted on the bug tracker, not on the forums.

Offline

#3 2009-07-01 15:03:05

markg85
Member
Registered: 2009-06-27
Posts: 153

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Why is this a "bug" report? isn't it an entirely new package.. or is php meant to be in the extra repository anyway (like 5.2.10 is a.t.m.) and should it just be updated?

Sorry, still kinda new to ArchLinux

Offline

#4 2009-07-01 15:25:55

Allan
Pacman
From: Brisbane, AU
Registered: 2007-06-09
Posts: 11,672
Website

Offline

#5 2009-07-01 16:33:23

markg85
Member
Registered: 2009-06-27
Posts: 153

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Oke, guess i have to wait till those issues you describe are resolved..

Offline

#6 2009-07-01 18:50:21

Ramses de Norre
Member
From: Leuven - Belgium
Registered: 2007-03-27
Posts: 1,289

Re: [request] Php 5.3

markg85 wrote:

Why is this a "bug" report? isn't it an entirely new package.. or is php meant to be in the extra repository anyway (like 5.2.10 is a.t.m.) and should it just be updated?

Sorry, still kinda new to ArchLinux

Sorry, I must have misread your post. I thought you were asking for a configuration change in a package already in testing. As the package isn't in the repo yet, a bug report of feature request is a bit early I guess. I'd wait untill the package is in testing and if the developer didn't configure it as you think he should, you can then report it as a bug/feature request.

Offline

#7 2009-07-10 13:12:51

delacruz
Member
From: /home/houston
Registered: 2007-12-09
Posts: 102

Re: [request] Php 5.3

any idea when this will be in the repo?

Offline

#8 2009-07-10 13:57:43

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,967
Website

Re: [request] Php 5.3

the pkgbuild is ready; just waiting for the libjpeg move and for new versions of apc and suhosin.

Offline

#9 2009-09-16 22:27:38

MindTooth
Member
From: Norway
Registered: 2008-11-11
Posts: 331

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Can I use mysqlnd with the [testing]-version?

Birger smile

Offline

#10 2009-09-17 00:07:22

Pierre
Developer
From: Bonn
Registered: 2004-07-05
Posts: 1,967
Website

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Well, wrong question. You have to use mysqlnd.

Offline

#11 2009-09-17 07:33:13

MindTooth
Member
From: Norway
Registered: 2008-11-11
Posts: 331

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Fine by me;)

Birger smile

Offline

#12 2009-09-22 11:43:10

MindTooth
Member
From: Norway
Registered: 2008-11-11
Posts: 331

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Announcement is made.

Birger smile

Offline

#13 2009-11-29 14:39:01

Lyceuhns
Member
From: João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil
Registered: 2008-05-09
Posts: 121

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?

(I don't think this is very KISS...)

Offline

#14 2009-11-29 15:39:25

wonder
Developer
From: Bucharest, Romania
Registered: 2006-07-05
Posts: 5,941
Website

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Lyceuhns wrote:

Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?

(I don't think this is very KISS...)

ask the maintainer.


Give what you have. To someone, it may be better than you dare to think.

Offline

#15 2009-11-29 17:32:34

Lyceuhns
Member
From: João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil
Registered: 2008-05-09
Posts: 121

Re: [request] Php 5.3

wonder wrote:
Lyceuhns wrote:

Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?

(I don't think this is very KISS...)

ask the maintainer.

Done. smile

I'm waiting for answer. o/

Offline

#16 2009-12-17 20:01:30

Lyceuhns
Member
From: João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil
Registered: 2008-05-09
Posts: 121

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Lyceuhns wrote:
wonder wrote:
Lyceuhns wrote:

Before post it on bug tracker, i wanted to be sure:
If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?

(I don't think this is very KISS...)

ask the maintainer.

Done. smile

I'm waiting for answer. o/

Almost 3 weeks, and no response. unfortunately. neutral

Offline

#17 2009-12-17 20:16:28

foutrelis
Developer
From: Athens, Greece
Registered: 2008-07-28
Posts: 705
Website

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Lyceuhns wrote:

If php-suhosin package is distributed, why patch pure PHP instalation with suhosin too?

They are different things but the confusion between the two is understandable. I hope the following quote clears things up.

http://www.hardened-php.net/suhosin/index.html wrote:

Suhosin comes in two independent parts, that can be used separately or in combination. The first part is a small patch against the PHP core, that implements a few low-level protections against bufferoverflows or format string vulnerabilities and the second part is a powerful PHP extension that implements all the other protections.

There is also a more detailed listing of their respective features.

Last edited by foutrelis (2009-12-17 20:16:56)

Offline

#18 2009-12-17 21:19:37

Lyceuhns
Member
From: João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil
Registered: 2008-05-09
Posts: 121

Re: [request] Php 5.3

Thanks foutrelis, i did not know that it was in 2 parts.

But anyway, it is a addon to the package, not a crucial patch to get it to work, so i think that if some one want it, add it by yourself, ABS is there for it.

The maintainer may have your reasons, but this is my point of view (taking the Arch and KIS philosophy).

Cheers.

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB